Logo

ESG Data

ESG Data

  • Environment
  • Social
  • Governance

Environment

  • Data aggregation was performed in accordance with the Environment Accounting Guideline published by Japan's Ministry of the Environment
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Unless otherwise noted in the footnotes or tables, business sites of consolidated companies are included in the data, but non-production sites (primarily the main building, sales offices, and other sites that perform managerial and administrative work and sites where GHG and environment impact are extremely low) are excluded.
  • Aggregation period : Japan: April 1 - March 31 of each fiscal year, Overseas: January 1 - December 31 of each fiscal year (April 1 - March 31 in India and Myanmar)

1. Environment conservation cost1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: million yen)

Category Main initiatives FY2021
Investment Cost
1. Environment conservation costs for curbing environment impact generated by production and service activities within business sites 6,002 17,692
Breakdown ⅰ Environment conservation management costs Measures against air pollution, water pollution, noise and vibration, etc. 884 10,620
ⅱ Global environment conservation costs Cultivating company-owned forests in Japan, forest plantation operations outside Japan, energy conservation investments 1,382 642
ⅲ Resource circulation costs Efficient utilization of resources, costs for waste measures 3,736 6,430
2. Costs for curbing environment impact generated upstream or downstream by production and service activities Costs for purchasing low-sulfur fuel (balance amount) 45 247
3. Environment conservation cost related to administrative activities Employee education, ISO 14001 costs, costs for air and water analysis, costs for operating committees and other organizations, etc. 4 920
4. Environment conservation costs related to R&D activities Product development that contributes to environment conservation by promoting utilization of recovered paper, curbing environment impact that occurs during production, etc. 84 2,736
5. Environment conservation costs related to social activities Philanthropic programs, support for various environment groups, environment and sustainability reporting, Eco-Products exhibit, etc. 0 45
6. Costs related to environment damage Pollution impact levy (SOx) 0 527
Total 6,135 22,168
  • 1)Boundary of data aggregation: Companies in Japan of Oji Holdings, Oji Paper, Oji Materia, Oji F-Tex, Oji Imaging Media, Oji Nepia, Oji Cornstarch, Oji Tac, Oji Container, Morishigyo, Oji Green Resources, Oji Forest & Products

2. Economic benefit associated with environment conservation activities1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: million yen)

Effect FY2019  FY2020 FY2021 
Income from company-owned forests in Japan 411 415  432  
Reduced expenses from energy saved 1,977 1,840  1,541  
Income from recycling 3,542 3,439  3,552  
Total 5,930 5,694  5,525  
  • 1)Boundary of data aggregation: Companies in Japan of Oji Holdings, Oji Paper, Oji Materia, Oji F-Tex, Oji Imaging Media, Oji Nepia, Oji Cornstarch, Oji Tac, Oji Container, Morishigyo, Oji Green Resources, Oji Forest & Products

3. Greenhouse gas (GHG)1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Scope 1 (Direct emissions) Emission (kt-CO2e) 6,595 6,394 6,323 6,267 6,398 ★
Intensity (t-CO2e/ million yen) 4.439 4.123 4.194 4.611 4.405
Scope 2 (Indirect emissions) Emission (kt-CO2e) 1,349 1,442 1,327 1,193 1,208 ★
Intensity (t-CO2e/ million yen) 0.899 0.930 0.880 0.878 0.822
Scope 1+2 Emission (kt-CO2e) 7,944 7,836 7,650 7,460 7,606 ★
Intensity (t-CO2e/ Sales million yen) 5.347 5.052 5.074 5.489 5.174
Scope 1 breakdown by GHG type (kt-CO2e) CO2 6,932 6,832 6,623 6,413 6,536
CH4 153 148 149 149 147
N2O 859 856 878 898 922
HFC N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
PFC N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
SF6 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
NF3 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
Total 7,944 7,836 7,650 7,460 7,606
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2021 figures have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1) Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
    Scope 1 Calculation
    Japan: Calculated in accordance with Act on Rationalizing Energy Use (Energy Conservation Act) and Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (Global Warming Act)
    • Emissions relating to the electric power business (supply of electricity or heat to other companies) and transport by Group-owned vehicles are included.
    • CO2 emissions from the use of purchased fuels made from waste are excluded.
    Overseas: Calculated based on the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative
    • Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from simply burning waste are excluded.
    • Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from waste disposal and wastewater treatment are excluded.
    • Non-energy greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) resulting from quicklime production (lime kiln) are excluded.
    Scope 2 Calculation
    Japan: Basic emissions factors of individual electric power companies published by the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry
    Overseas: IEA-published CO2 emission factors by country in 2010

4. Scope 3

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: kiloton-CO2e)

Category and Coverage FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Domestic Overseas Total Domestic Overseas Total Domestic Overseas Total
  1. Purchased goods and services1)
 2,489 1,278 3,766 2,158 1,272 3,430 2,322 1,341 3,663 ★
  1. Capital goods2)
 150 118 267 121 216 337 131 480 610
  1. Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)3)
 340 318 657 341 277 618 354 350 704
  1. Upstream transportation and distribution4)
 225 138 362 223 140 363 221 160 381
  1. Waste generated in operations5)
 18 60 77 19 12 31 23 47 69
  1. Business travel6)
 2 3 5 2 3 5 2 3 5
  1. Employee commuting7)
 8 11 19 7 11 18 7 12 19
  1. Upstream leased assets8)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. Downstream transportation and distribution9)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. Processing of sold products10)
 136 0 136 122 0 122 122 0 122
  1. Use of sold products11)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. End of life treatment of sold products12)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. Downstream leased assets13)
 ＜0.1 0 ＜0.1 ＜0.1 0 ＜0.1 ＜0.1 0 ＜0.1
  1. Franchises14)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. Investments15)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 3,366 1,924 5,290 2,993 1,931 4,924 3,181 2,392 5,573
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2021 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)Emissions associated with activities up to the point when materials/components, materials related to purchased goods and sale, etc. are manufactured. For emission intensities, we have referred to the “Emission intensity database for calculation of GHG emissions by organizations throughout the supply chain (ver. 2.6)” and the “CO2 equivalents common intensity database (ver. 4.0).”
  • 2)Emission from building and producing capital goods of our companies
  • 3)Emission from purchasing fuel, electricity, heats and generating electricity
  • 4)Emission from transportation and distribution of raw materials, parts, purchased goods and sales materials to our companies
  • 5)Emission from transportation and disposal of waste generated in our companies
  • 6)Emission from business travel of employees
  • 7)Emission from employees commuting
  • 8)Emission from operation of leased assets that our companies leased. Calculated in Scope1, 2
  • 9)Emission from operating leased assets that our companies leased. Category 4 Includes transport, delivery (upstream).
  • 10)Processing of sold products; - Emission from processing of intermediate products by business operators
  • 11)Emission from use of products by users (consumers, business operators). Since the Group's main sales products, paper products, do not use energy during use, the Group considers that GHG emissions during product use are zero.
  • 12)Emission from transportation and disposal of products when disposing by users (consumers, business operators). The Group's main sales products are paper products, which emit CO2 when discarded. However, the Group's raw materials absorb CO2 when grown, so the Group's emissions are offset and considered to be zero.
  • 13)Downstream leased assets; - Emission from operating leased assets that our companies leased.
  • 14)Emission by franchises. Since the Group is not the president of the franchise, the emissions sources falling under this category are considered to be zero.
  • 15)Emission related with investments management. Since the Group is not an investment or financial institution, zero emissions sources are considered to fall under this category.

5. Energy consumption

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Segment FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Fuel type of using
(Electric power equivalent GWh)		 Oil 4,397 3,888 3,542 3,537 3,439
Coal 8,388 8,164 7,632 7,533 7,611
Gas 4,202 4,096 4,095 3,982 4,467
Purchased energy 3,920 4,160 3,852 3,603 3,472
Biomass, sludge,etc 33,037 33,076 33,024 30,130 31,615
Waste 7,328 7,195 7,273 7,284 7,552
Hydro 324 397 375 360 366
Solar 5 5 5 5 5
Sub total 61,601 60,982 59,797 56,434 58,531
Total energy consumption1)
(Crude Oil equivalent)		 Consumption
(million liter)		 5,874 5,822 5,660 5,219 5,400 ★
Intensity
(kilo-liter/t-production)		 0.369 0.364 0.365 0.365 0.359
Production capacity by energy type
(MW)		 Thermal power 2) 1,622 1,622 1,697 1,697 1,697
Hydro power 72 72 72 72 72
Solar power 4 4 4 4 4
Real power generation by energy type
(GWh/ yr) 3)		 Thermal power 7,899 7,695 7,969 7,864 7,985
Hydro power 324 397 350 360 366
Solar power 5 5 5 5 5
Real power consumption
(GWh /yr)		 Total power consumption 11,121 11,100 11,091 10,757 11,006
Renewable energy power in total power consumption 4,390 4,451 4,611 4,338 4,535
Purchased power from renewable energy4) 0 0 0 0 0
Biomass power generation companies
Power generation capacity by type
(MW)		 Biomass power generation 51 51 126 126 126
Energy input
(electric power equivalent GWh)		 Coal 10.0 1.0 32.2 37.1 0.0
Oil 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.0
Biomass 402.2 414.3 668.1 968.9 986.1
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2021 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)Energy consumption: Energy consumption in conjunction with the manufacture of products is calculated excluding the following energy use.
    Consumption relating to the electric power business (supply of electricity or heat to other parties) and transport by Group-owned vehicles is excluded.
    Energy relating to the supply of electric power or heat to other party is excluded from fossil fuel and non-fossil fuel derived energy.
    Unit calorific values are calculated by using the following laws and international standards.
    Japan: Act on Rationalizing Energy Use and Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures
    Overseas: IPCC 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Since unit calorific values for non-fossil fuels emphasize comparability to reduction targets, the factors set in the FY2018 report are used.
  • 2)Thermal Power Generation by the Group
    • Thermal power generation includes power generation capacity of spare facilities. Thermal power generation refers to the sum of Oil and Coal, Biomass, Wastes burning alone and mixed burning.
  • 3)Performance of the Group's Power Generation
    • The total amount of electricity consumed and sold in-house is shown in the figure.
  • 4)Enter the amount of purchased electricity that can be proved to be derived from renewable energy, such as the Green Power Certification.

6. Acquisition status of environment management system (EMS)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment As of March 31, 2020 As of March 31, 2021 As of March 31, 2022
Number of sites covered by ISO14001 137 156 156
Percentage of sites covered by ISO14001 (%) 100 100 100
  • Note: In Oji Group, 137 worksites are promoting to obtain ISO 14001 and all of them have obtained ISO 14001 certification as of March 31 2020.

7. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Number of environment-related violations1) 2 0 3
Administrative penalties, including environment-related fines and suspensions of operations No occurrence No occurrence No occurrence
  • 1)Violation of environmental laws and regulations regarding water withdrawal, wastewater, air, waste, etc.
    The external impact of the violation is minor and has not caused any complaints from local residents.

8. Environmental burden substances1) (BOD, COD, and SS) in wastewater and drainage amount

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
BOD emission (t) 7,860 7,740 7,567 7,013
Emission intensity (kg/ t-production) 0.49 0.50 0.53 0.47
(kg/million yen) 5.07 5.13 5.57 4.77
Emission intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate2) (base year) 1.3% 9.9% -5.9%
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) (base year) Not achieved
(5.00)		 Not achieved
(4.93)		 Achieved
(4.87)
COD emission (t) 34,932 35,038 32,897 35,862
Emission intensity (kg/ t-production) 2.19 2.26 2.30 2.38
(kg/million yen) 22.52 23.24 24.21 24.39
Emission intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate2) (base year) 3.2% 7.5% 8.3%
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) (base year) Not achieved
(22.22)		 Not achieved
(21.92)		 Not achieved
(21.62)
SS emission (t) 14,829 14,436 13,094 12,242
Emission intensity (kg/ t-production) 0.93 0.93 0.91 0.81
(kg/million yen) 9.56 9.58 9.63 8.33
Emission intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate2) (base year) 0.2% 0.8% -12.9%
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) (base year) Not achieved
(9.43)		 Not achieved
(9.30)		 Achieved
(9.18)
Total wastewater (1,000 m3) 708,494 701,024 671,965 675,849 ★
Wastewater destination River and lake 280,690 277,848 272,227 269,339
Sea 354,651 354,108 339,423 343,993
Groundwater 2 2 10 8
Sewer 73,150 69,065 60,305 62,509
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2021 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)BOD (Biochemical oxygen demand), COD (Chemical oxygen demand), SS (Suspended solids)
    Boundary of data aggregation; all consolidated companies that be regulated with wastewater.
  • 2)Emissions intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate target: Reduce by 15% in FY 2030 compared to FY 2018

9. Amount of environment burden substances in emitted gas1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
SOx emission (t) 6,394 5,704 5,529 5,424
Emission intensity (kg/t-production) 0.40 0.37 0.39 0.36
(kg/million yen) 4.12 3.78 4.07 3.69
Emission intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate2) (base year) -8.2% -1.3% -10.5%
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) (base year) Achieved
(4.07)		 Not achieved
(4.01)		 Achieved
(3.96)
NOx emission (t) 10,834 10,750 10,118 12,385
Emission intensity (kg/t-production) 0.68 0.69 0.71 0.82
(kg/million yen) 6.99 7.13 7.44 8.42
Dust emission (t) 2,944 3,097 3,148 3,143
Emission intensity (kg/t-production) 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.21
(kg/million yen) 1.90 2.05 2.32 2.14
VOC emission (t) 523 481 227 232 ★
Emission intensity3) (kg/t-production) 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02
(kg/million yen) 0.34 0.32 0.17 0.16
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2021 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)Boundary of data aggregation
    • SOx, NOx and Dust: all consolidated companies that be regulated.
    • VOC: Domestic Group companies subject to Japanese pollutant release and transfer register (PRTR) law have been included. Of the substances subject to PRTR law, those corresponding to the 100 types of VOC indicated by the Ministry of the Environment based on the Air Pollution Control Act have been included.
  • 2)Emissions intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate target: Reduce by 15% in FY 2030 compared to FY 2018
  • 3)Emissions intensity (kg/million yen) target: 0.305 (FY 2010 performance x 50%) or less

10. Waste and PRTR chemical substances

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Industrial waste generation1) Domestic (kt) 1,494 1,517 1,458 1,347 1,410
Overseas (kt) 1,288 1,358 1,299 1,386 1,363
Total (kt) 2,782 2,875 2,757 2,733 2,772 ★
Generation intensity (kg/t-production) 174.7 180.0 177.8 191.0 184.3
(kg/million yen) 1,872 1,854 1,829 2,011 1,886
Efficient use amount (kt) 2,617 2,708 2,586 2,570 2,611
Landfill amount (Final disposal amount) Domestic (kt) 25 25 23 17 13
Overseas (kt) 140 141 149 146 149
Total (kt) 165 166 172 163 161
Landfill intensity (kg/t-production) 10.4 10.4 11.1 11.4 10.7
(kg/million yen) 111 107 114 120 110
Effective waste utilization rate2) Domestic (%) 98.3 98.3 98.4 98.8 99.1
Overseas (%) 89.1 89.6 88.5 89.4 89.1
Hazardous waste generation amount (t) 23,252 14,059 8,723 11,832 8,623
Generation intensity (kg/t-production) 1.46 0.88 0.56 0.83 0.57
(kg/million yen) 15.6 9.06 5.79 8.71 5.87
PRTR Chemical substance released amount and transferred amount3) (t) 826 787 750 440 482
Released and transferred intensity (kg/t-production) 0.052 0.049 0.048 0.031 0.032
(kg/million yen) 0.56 0.51 0.50 0.32 0.33
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2021 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)The volume of waste generated includes valuable materials (general waste is not included).
  • 2)Effective waste utilization ratio = (Amount of waste generated − Amount of landfill waste) ÷ Amount of waste generated × 100
    Target: 99% or more in Japan, 95% or more overseas in FY 2030
  • 3)PRTR data cover all consolidated companies that submit the notifications of PRTR

11. Amounts of substances subject to the PRTR Law released and transferred

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(FY 2021)

Chemical Substance (unit) Handled amount including generated amount Amount Released Amount Transferred Total Amount
Zinc compounds (water-soluble) (t) 9.3 0.2 0.2 0.4
Acrylic acid and its water-soluble salt (t) 1.3 - 0.004 0.004
n-Butyl Acrylate (t) 4.4 0.2 0.6 0.8
Methyl acrylate (t) - - - -
2-Aminoethanol (t) 14.7 0.004 0.2 0.2
Asbestos (t) 6.1 - 6.1 6.1
Isoprene (t) 9.1 0.1 - 0.1
Ethylbenzene (t) 3.6 0.12 0.3 0.4
Ethylene oxide (t) 1.7 0.01 - 0.01
Ferric chloride (t) 122.9 - - -
Xylene (t) 22.5 0.3 0.6 1.0
Chromium and trivalent chromium compounds (t) 22.8 0.002 0.01 0.02
Chloroform (t) 15.2 15.2 - 15.2
Vinyl acetate (t) 341.2 0.7 0.6 1.4
Cyclohexylamine (t) 1.2 1.2 - 1.2
2,2-Dibromo-2-cyanoacetamide (t) 57.6 25.6 0.2 25.8
Styrene (t) 180.1 - 0.1 0.1
Dioxins (mg-TEQ) 429.0 114.9 314.1 429.0
Decanoic acid (t) - - - -
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (t) 6.7 4.6 - 4.6
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (t) 11.9 0.03 - 0.03
Toluene (t) 1,962.6 177.7 169.4 347.1
Hexamethylene diacrylate (t) 3.8 - - -
Nickel (t) 14.6 0.005 0.008 0.01
Oxin copper(t) 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.4
Methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate (t) 1.4 0.09 0.1 0.2
Phenol (t) 4.6 0.01 0.2 0.2
Hydrogen fluoride（ton） 5.1 5.10 - 5.1
n-Hexane (t) 11.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
Benzene (t) 37.8 35.9 - 35.9
Boron compounds (t) 231.2 17.4 1.4 18.8
Poly (oxyethylene) alkyl ether (alkyl C=12-15) (t) 1.8 1.8 - 1.8
Sodium poly (oxyethylene) dodecyl ether sulfate (t) 8.8 6.0 - 6.0
Formaldehyde (t) 1.0 0.8 0.00 0.8
Manganese and its compounds (t) 8.0 6.8 - 6.8
Methylnaphthalene (t) 269.5 1.3 - 1.3
Methylenebis (4.1-phenylene) = diisocyanate (t) 1.5 - - -
Total 3,396 302 180 482
  • The Data covers all consolidated companies that submit the notifications of PRTR.
  • Excluding dioxins, numbers prepared for substances of which one ton or more (0.5 tons or more Specified Class 1 Designated Chemical Substances) is handled ( including amount produced).

12. Usage of main raw materials

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Main raw materials FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Woodchip and lumber (kt) 13,337 13,432 13,171 11,940 12,421
Recovered paper (kt) 4,367 4,343 4,339 4,374 4,411
Pulp (kt) 358 341 328 312 308
Purchased containerboard and corrugated sheet (kt) 3,069 3,309 3,262 3,212 3,424
Total (kt) 21,130 21,425 21,100 19,838 20,564
  • Note:Amount includes intra-group transaction

13. Water resource

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Water intake (1,000 m3) 740,398 736,684 706,298 714,281 ★
Water intake intensity (m3/ t-production) 46.4 47.5 49.3 47.5
(m3/ million yen) 477.4 488.6 519.7 485.9
Water intake intensity (m3/million yen) reduction rate1) (base year) 2.4% 8.9% 1.8%
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) (base year) Not achieved
(474.9)		 Not achieved
(472.5)		 Not achieved
(470.1)
Breakdown of water intake
(1,000 m3)		 Surface water
(river, lake, sea, brackish water)		 487,936 483,096 476,998 480,023
Groundwater
(well water, subsoil water)		 151,295 147,125 127,843 127,039
Third party organization
(water supply, city water)		 101,168 106,463 101,457 107,219
Recycled water amount (1,000 m3) 694,746 687,411 654,924 661,865
Recycled ratio (%) 94% 93% 93% 93%
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2021 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)Water intake intensity (m3/million yen) reduction rate target: Reduce by 6% in 2030 compared to FY 2018

Changes in water consumption

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Water intake (1,000 m3) 740,398 736,684 706,298 714,281
Wastewater (1,000 m3) 708,494 701,024 671,965 675,849
Water consumption (1,000 m3) 31,904 35,659 34,333 38,432
Water consumption intensity (m3/t-production) 2.00 2.30 2.40 2.55
(m3/ million yen) 20.57 23.65 25.26 26.14

14. Water intensity in electric power business1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Gross generation (MWh) 412,587 415,631 700,887 1,006,844 986,135
Water intake (m3) 1,560,392 1,537,505 2,090,868 2,662,414 2,684,595
Water intensity (m3/MWh) 3.78 3.70 2.98 2.64 2.72
  • 1) Electric power companies (Oji Green Energy Nichinan Co. Ltd., Oji Green Energy Ebetsu Co. Ltd., MPM Oji Eco Energy Co., Ltd.)

15. Recovered paper utilization

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Paper and paperboard production amount1) Paper (kt) 3,081 3,011 2,902 2,287 2,441
Paperboard (kt) 3,059 3,190 3,201 3,116 3,189
Total (kt) 6,140 6,202 6,104 5,403 5,630
Recovered paper used amount2) Paper (kt) 971 911 872 728 661
Paperboard (kt) 3,122 3,170 3,138 3,098 3,174
Total (kt) 4,093 4,081 4,010 3,826 3,834
Recovered paper utilization ratio2) Paper (%) 31.3 29.9 30.9 30.9 27.6
Paperboard (%) 94.8 95.2 95.4 95.9 95.4
Total (%) 64.0 64.0 65.6 68.5 67.1
Target2) (%) 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 70.0
Achievement rate (%) 98.4 98.4 100.9 105.3 95.8
  • 1)Paper and paperboard production amount in Japan
  • 2)Aggregation period: From January to December for the amount of recovered paper use, from April to March for recovered paper utilization ratio
    Scope of data aggregation: Companies in Japan of Oji Paper, Oji Materia, Oji F-Tex, Oji Nepia
    Recovered paper utilization ratio = Volume of recovered paper consumed ÷ Total volume of fiber raw materials consumed (total consumption of recovered paper, wood pulp, and other fiber raw materials)
    Target for recovered paper utilization ratio: 65% from FY2016 to FY2020, 70% or above from FY2021 to FY2030

16. Environment-related data by segment

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(FY2021)

Operating
sites		 Production
(kt)		 GHG Water
resource		 Industrial
waste		 Domestic
chemical
substances		 Environmental
burden
in wastewater		 Environmental
burden
in emission gas
Emissio
(kt-CO2e)		 Intensity
(tCO2e/ t-production)		 Water intake
(1,000 m3)		 Intensity
(m3/ t-production)		 Final disposal amount
(t-Appearance)		 Intensity
(kg/ t-production)		 PRTR chemical substances
(t-released and transferred)		 Intensity
(g/ t-production)		 BOD
(t)		 COD
(t)		 SS
(t)		 SOx
(t-SO2 conversion)		 NOx
(t-NO2 conversion)		 Soot and Dust
(t)
Industrial Material Business
169 6,620 3,044 0.460 199,126 30.1 13,509 2.0 135 20 3,324 3,588 2,240 2,115 2,983 201
Household and Consumer Product Business
7 204 78 0.384 3,957 19.4 50 0.2 （*1） （*1） （*1） 163 35 <1 4 1
Functional Materials Business
26 650 579 0.890 48,433 74.5 2,532 3.9 287 442 646 155 609 657 380 49
Forest Resources and Environment Marketing Business
33 3,224 623 0.193 65,285 20.3 60,409 18.7 0 0 1,413 14,046 384 43 2,280 1,731
Printing and Communications Media Business
7 3,219 2,835 0.880 348,514 108.3 5,857 1.8 60 19 801 17,894 7,445 2,610 5,917 312
Other business
49 1,127 447 0.397 48,967 43.5 78,972 70.1 0 0 829 16 1,529 0 820 849
Total (consolidated companies)
291 15,043 7,606 0.506 714,281 47.5 161,328 10.7 482 32 7,013 35,862 12,242 5,424 12,385 3,143
  • Production volume includes the volume of transactions within the group.
  • See note under "3. Greenhouse Gases (GHG)" for the calculation method of GHG emissions.
  • The environmental impact (BOD, COD, SS) of water emissions and the environmental impact (SOx, NOx, soot and dust) of air emissions are the amounts of emissions from business sites to which regulations are applied.

Note: (*1) Emissions not listed because there are no sites where regulations are applied.

17. Forest certification acquisition rate1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Overseas Forest Plantations Forest Certification Area (ha) 181,134 217,521 222,545 211,907 213,821
Forest Certification Rate 89% 92% 94% 91% 92%
Company-owned Forests in Japan (excluding shared forests) Forest Certification Area (ha) 172,641 172,641 172,641 172,635 172,627
Forest Certification Rate 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Overall forest certification rate 94% 95% 96% 95% 95%
  • 1)Overseas: Area ratio in company-owned production forests, Japan: Area ratio in company-owned forests excluding shared forests

18. Oji Group forest area

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

As of March 2022

Country （Area) Operating company / Business overview Year established Production forests (ha) Conseveation forests (ha) Total(ha) Forest certification code
New Zealand (South Island) Sounthland Plantation Forest Company of New Zealand Ltd. (SPFL) 1992 9,697 2,996 12,693 NC-FM/COC-001130
FM: FM107252/CoC: CoC107252
Australia (Western Australia) Albany Palnataion Forest Company of Australia Ltd. (APFL) 1993 5,376 1,325 6,701 SA-CW/FM-006020
Vietnam（Bin Dinh) Quy Nhon Plantation Forest Company of Vietnam Ltd. (QPFL) 1995 8,833 1,000 9,833 SGS-FM/COC-002539
Australia (Victoria) Green Triangle  Plantation Forest Company of Australia Pty. Ltd. (GPFL) 1997 2,589 0 2,589  
China (Huizhou) Huizhou Nanyou Forest Development Co., Ltd.  (KPFL) 2002 2,931 1,010 3,941  
Indonesia (Kalimantan) PT Korintiga Hutani (KTH) 1998 38,943 11,596 50,540 SGS-CW/FM-009866
AJA/IFCC-PEFC/FMC-HT/00038/1/2018
Vietnam (Phu Yen) Truong Thanh Oji Plantation Forest Company Limited （TTO) 2011 2,288 254 2,542 SGS-FM/COC-011627
Brazil (Minas Gerais) Celulose Nipo-Brasileira S.A (CENIBRA) 1973 143,918 105,731 249,649 IMA-FM/COC-007629
IMA-COC-007630/IMA-CW-007630
New Zealand (North island) Pan Pac Forest Products Ltd. (PAN PAC) 1971 35,360 4,517 39,877 SGS-FM/COC-000850
BR021517-1
New Zealand (North island) Oji Fibre Solutions (OjiFS) 2014 6,313 200 6,513  
Overseas subtotal 256,249 128,629 384,878  
Japan 176,271 11,552 187,823 SGEC-FM: JAFTA-002, JAFTA-008, JAFTA-012
SGEC-CoC: JAFTA-W025
Total 432,520 140,181 572,701  

19. Procurement volume of wood chips and market pulp for Oji Group

Wood chip

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Origin FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 Raw material composition
(k BDT) (%) (k BDT) (%) (k BDT) (%)
  943.1 20% 775.1 21% 813.0 18% Sawmill residue
Vietnam 922.2 19% 737.3 20% 1,018.4 23% Planted tree
Thai 964.4 20% 697.5 19% 750.4 17% Planted tree
Indonesia 349.2 7% 364.1 10% 440.5 10% Planted tree
Australia 649.3 13% 358.5 10% 562.8 13% Planted tree
U.S.A. 253.0 5% 243.7 7% 284.2 6% Sawmill residue
Chili 293.8 6% 189.7 5% 238.8 5% Planted tree
New Zealand 148.2 3% 109.0 3% 162.6 4% Planted tree
Malaysia 141.0 3% 98.3 3% 64.8 1% Planted tree
Fiji 94.2 2% 88.6 22% 93.8 2% Planted tree
South Africa 76.4 2% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% Planted tree
Total 4,834.7 100% 3,661.8 100% 4,429.3 100%  

Market pulp

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Origin FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 Raw material composition
(k ADT) (%) (k ADT) (%) (k ADT) (%)
Brazil 66.5 34% 64.6 48% 81.6 50% Planted tree
New Zealand 67.7 35% 35.4 27% 35.2 22% Planted tree, Sawmil residue
Canada 34.0 17% 18.0 13% 15.5 10% Regrowt forest
Japan 12.1 6% 8.5 6% 17.4 11% Sawmill residue
Sweden 8.5 4% 3.8 3% 5.4 3% Regrowt forest
U.S.A 5.2 3% 2.6 2% 3.6 2% Planted tree, Sawmil residue
Finland 0.4 0% 0.4 0% 1.8 1% Regrowt forest
Chili 0.0 0% 0.2 0% 1.1 1% Planted tree
Total 194.4 100% 133.5 100% 161.6 100%  
  • We have confirmed that the wood chips and the market pulp are wood raw materials that meet FSCC™ certifiied materials and FSCC™ requirements.

20. Carbon stocks and net increment in carbon stocks by production and conservation forest

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 Average
Carbon stocks1) (kt-CO2) 102,342 103,649 105,809 109,335 -
Net increment in carbon stocks2) (kt-CO2/yr) 636 125 -189 2,041 653
Forest area covered3) (1,000 ha) 463 461 453 465 -
  • 1)Actual carbon stocks in living biomass
  • 　 Production forest: Actual merchantable volume at the end of each fiscal year x Biomass expansion coefficient x (1+underground / above-ground ratio) x Wood density x Carbon ratio x CO2 conversion coefficient.
  • 　 Conservation forest: Remaining area at the end of each fiscal year x above-ground biomass of natural forest x (1+underground / above-ground ratio) x carbon ratio x CO2 conversion coefficient.
  • 2)Net increment in carbon stocks by forests
    Production forest: CO2 absorption by growth - CO2 emission by felling
  • 　 Conservation forest: Remaining area at the end of each fiscal year x Annual growth rate of above-ground biomass x (1+underground / above-ground ratio) x carbon ratio x CO2 conversion coefficient.
  • 3)Forest area in the scope of calculation for carbon stocks and net increment in carbon stocks covers consolidated companies in line with GHG emissions.
  • 4)From 2021, for CNB, the calculated value (third-party guarantee) by CNB was applied to the overall total. Revised in the same way for 2018-2020.

21. Net GHG emissions

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2018
(Base year)		 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 Average
GHG emissions (Scope 1+2) (kt-CO2e/yr) 7,836 7,650 7,460 7,606 7,638
Net increment in carbon stocks (kt-CO2e/yr) 636 125 -189 2,041 653
Net GHG emissions (kt-CO2e/yr) 7,200 7,525 7,649 5,565 6,985
GHG reduction rate - -4% -2% -29% -11%

22. Environmental conservation activities

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Country Area Group company Program
Japan Hokkaido Oji Forest & Products Sarufutsu Itou Conservation Activities
Japan Kochi Oji Forest & Products Measures to Protect the Fairy Pitta (Koyagauchi company-owned forest in Kochi Prefecture)
Japan Hokkaido Oji Forest & Products Conservation activities for endangered alpine plants
Japan Yamanashi Oji Forest & Products Lily-of-the-Valley Habitat Conservation
Brazil Minas Gerais CENIBRA Mutumu Project
Brazil Minas Gerais CENIBRA Initiatives for preserving biodiversity
New Zealand Hawke's Bay Pan Pac Conservation activity for Kiwi
New Zealand Hawke's Bay Pan Pac Efforts to preserve and restore natural forest
New Zealand Hawke's Bay Pan Pac Efforts to restore indigenous forest in privately owned land
New Zealand Hawke's Bay Pan Pac Efforts to improve water quality and biodiversity by restoring riverside vegetation
New Zealand Southland SPFL Rare, Threatened and Endangered (RTE) species

Social

1. Employee

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Boundary of data aggregation As of Mar 31,
2018		 As of Mar 31,
2019		 As of Mar 31,
2020		 As of Mar 31,
2021		 As of Mar 31,
2022
Number of permanent employees Consolidated 17,082 36,309 36,810 36,034 35,608
Number of temporary employees Consolidated 2,446 2,705 2,507 2,335 2,467
Men and women rates (%) Consolidated (Male) 84.29 80.99 81.45 81.39 81.34
Consolidated (Female) 15.71 19.01 18.55 18.61 18.66
Permanent employees voluntary turnover rates (%) Oji HD 1.06 4.21 3.48 4.61 5.06
Oji MO 8.85 2.20 3.85 1.47 2.94
  • Oji HD; Oji Holdings, Oji MO; Oji Management office

2. Percentage of female managers1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Percentage of female managers (%) 2.9 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.7 ★
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2021 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1) Aggregation date: March 31 of each fiscal year
    Boundary of data aggregation: 16 group companies in Japan
    Percentage of female managers = Number of female managers ÷ Number of all managers

3. Percentage of female hirees for generalist-track positions

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Percentage of female hirees for generalist-track positions (%) 44 34 33 29 30
  • Boundary of data aggregation: 16 Group companies in Japan

4. Employment rate of people with disabilities1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Six applicable Group companies in Japan (%) 2.03 2.17 2.27 2.31 2.35 ★
Group companies in Japan (%) 1.83 1.91 2.01 2.04 2.10 ★
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2021 figures have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1) Aggregation date: June 1 after each fiscal year
    Boundary of data aggregation
    • Six applicable Group companies in Japan: Oji Holdings, Oji Nepia, Oji Imaging Media, Oji Paper, Oji Management Office, and Oji Clean Mate
    • Group companies in Japan: 82 Group companies in Japan, including the six applicable Group companies (at least 43.5 employees)
    Employment rate of people with disabilities (actual employment rate) = Number of regular workers with physical or intellectual impairments or with mental illness ÷ Number of all regular workers (Workers with short working hours are counted as 0.5 workers and persons with severe disabilities are counted as two persons)

5. Annual total working hours

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Annual total working hours
(hours / person-year)		 1,839 1,825 1,827 1,819 1,843
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Oji Group Tokyo Headquarters Area (26 companies)

6. Human rights violations

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Number of human rights violations (cases) 6 4 4 2
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Consolidated companies in Japan

7. Number of worksites acquired OHSAS18001 certification

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Domestic and overseas As of October 2019*1 As of May 2020*2 As of May 2021*3 As of May 2022*4
Number of worksites acquired OHSAS18001 certification / Number of all worksites Domestic 0 (239) 0 (240) 0 (240) 0 (245)
Overseas 9 (70) 3 (69) 0 (71) 0 (69)
  • ・Boundary of data aggregation: Consolidated companies
  • *Note:At the same time as renew the OHSAS 18001 certification, it does not include the worksites that have acquired ISO 45001 certification. (*1;2 sites, *2;4 sites, *3;8 sites, *4;0 sites).
  • Currently, 10 worksites of the Oji Group have acquired ISO 45001 certification.

8. Lost time injury frequency rate and severity rate for safety

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
LTIFR1) Oji Group Whole Group 1.02 0.89 0.88 0.81 0.97 ★
Japan 0.79 0.76 0.67 0.76 0.84 ★
Overseas 1.25 1.01 1.08 0.85 1.09 ★
Manufacturing3) 1.02 1.20 1.20 1.21 1.31
Pulp, paper and paper product manufacturing3) 1.46 1.88 1.94 1.54 1.85
Severity rate2) Oji Group Whole Group 0.22 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.05
Japan 0.22 0.03 0.22 0.23 0.05
Overseas 0.21 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.05
Manufacturing3) 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.06
Pulp, paper and paper product manufacturing3) 0.24 0.22 0.63 0.39 0.06
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2021 figures have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • ・Aggregation period: From January 1 to December 31, Boundary of data aggregation: Oji Holdings Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries
  • 1)LTIFR
    • LTIFR = (the number of lost time injuries ÷ total working hours) × 1,000,000
      Lost time injuries (LTI) is defined as an occurrence that resulted in a fatality, permanent disability or time lost from work of one day/shift or more.
    • Total working hours are calculated based on the number of group company employees (regular employees and temporary / non-regular employees) as of the end of September every year, assuming the annual working hours per person is 2,000 hours.
    • FY2020 figures were updated as a 2020 incident in Japan was recognized as an industrial accident after the previous Integrated Report was published.
  • 2)Severity rate
    • Severity rate = (Number of workday lost ÷ total work hours) x 1,000
    • Number of workday lost: Fatalities and severe incidents =7,500 days, temporary work lost = lost calendar days x 300/365
  • 3)Manufacturing, Pulp, paper and paper product manufacturing:
    • The data is quoted from an occupational accident survey (investigator: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, target worksites: 100 or more employees).

9. Lost time incidents and fatalities

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Number of work related lost time incidents1) Oji Group Whole Group 77 69 68 61 74
Japan (Permanent employees) 25 24 21 25 25
Japan (Non permanent employees) 5 6 4 2 6
Overseas (Permanent employees) 46 38 43 34 43
Overseas (Non permanent employees) 1 1 0 0 0
Contractors2) Whole Group 10 20 10 9 10
Japan 10 20 10 9 10
Overseas - - - - -
Number of work related fatalities Oji Group Whole Group 2 0 1 1 0
Japan (Permanent employees) 1 0 1 1 0
Japan (Non permanent employees) 0 0 0 0 0
Overseas (Permanent employees) 1 0 0 0 0
Overseas (Non permanent employees) 0 0 0 0 0
Contractors2) Whole Group 0 1 0 0 0
Japan 0 1 0 0 0
Overseas 0 0 0 0 0
Occasional entering contractors3) Whole Group 2 2 1 2 0
Japan 1 1 0 1 0
Overseas 1 1 1 1 0
  • Aggregation period: January 1 to December 31
  • Boundary of data aggregation: consolidated companies,contractors,occasional entering contractors
  • 1)Work related lost time incident :If 2 persons injured at one time,it counts 2.
  • 2)Contractors: affiliates being resident on the Group’s premises(non-consolidate companies in Oji Group and non-Oji Group companies)
  • 3)Occasional entering contractors: Business operators who enter the Group’s premises on a temporary basis.

10. Oji Group safety and health education records (in Japan)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Safety and Health Education programs FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
1. General Safety and Health Managers Seminar, Overall safety and health controller, Safety and Health Seminar for Top management 18 10 8 25
2. Education at the Time of appointment of a Safety Officer (including complementary education) 136 155 98 82
3. Health Officer education (including complementary education) 6 20 13 12
4. Safety and Health Promoter education (for worksites less than 50 workers) 10 24 14 7
5. Foremen, etc. education/Safety and Health Controller education (including Capacity development) , RodoshoSafety and Health Education Trainer 1,069 371 206 314
6. Education at the time of employment (for new employees) 1,165 1,031 655 828
7. Education for relocated and transferred employees 352 271 422 456
8. Skill training course (Operations Chief or training for restricted employment) 1,629 1,137 776 1,162
9. Special education (Education for safety and health to those who are currently engaged in dangerous or harmful work) 736 2,289 1,063 1,674
10. Risk assessment training 280 264 217 427
11. OSHMS (Occupational Safety and Health Management System) related education/training 76 33 27 45
12. Machine safety education 291 84 39 1
13. Chemical Management education - 307 229 117
14. Work-related        
  Safety and Health education for workers in charge of dangerous or harmful work (except for Special Education) 240 225 213 369
Safety education on heavy machines including forklifts 3,917 4,222 2,327 2,796
Danger and safety sensory education (Including education with virtual reality devices) 2,920 2,013 14,172 12,776
Health and safety education on dangerous chemicals/powder substances (powder dust) 1,278 280 590 666
Safety education on electricity/education for workers responsible for power control 1,220 1,033 1,050 941
Health and safety education on ionizing radiation 995 353 320 401
Others 195 469 395 40
15. For each rank        
  Health and safety education 1- 5 years after joining the company 87 842 894 1,482
Health and safety education for junior workers 745 262 334 203
Health and safety education for middle/senior-level workers 2,018 1,774 1,182 1,497
Health and safety education for general workers 131 588 915 1,114
Health and safety education for managers and supervisors 494 1,056 808 1,086
Education for employees in charge of safety education (including instructors) 114 229 197 183
Others - 294 67 906
16. Training and lecture        
  KYT training/ KYT leader training (KYT: Kiken Yochi Training (Hazard Prediction training)) 71 263 234 94
First aid training (including AED (Automated External Defibrillator)) 353 909 292 223
Prevention of heatstroke 2,032 9,900 6,291 4,444
Mental health and Health promotion 127 947 559 536
Traffic safety 2,348 6,276 3,225 4,098
Others 517 7,100 4,714 3,329
17. Other (education on a variety of qualifications and work) 1,677 709 774 277
18. Other (fire and earthquake drill) - 9,598 11,028 10,887
Total 27,247 55,338 54,348 53,498
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Consolidated companies in Japan, but does not include some non-production bases (head offices, sales offices, etc., which are primarily responsible for administrative affairs).

11. Social contribution

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Total Amount of corporate donations (million yen) 435 225 119 279
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Consolidated companies

12. Social contribution activities

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Group company Country/ Area Program
1. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Partnerships with Beekeepers
2. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Agricultural Partnerships.
3. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Action and Citizenship Project
4. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Improving access to the world information of the communities "Computer classes"
5. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil UNIECO - Company-Community Integration Units
6. Pan Pac Napier, New Zealand Youth education
7. Pan Pac Hastings, New Zealand Environmental conservation
8. Pan Pac Hawke's Bay, New Zealand Environmental conservation
9. Pan Pac Maungataniwha, New Zealand Biodoversity enhancement
10. Pan Pac Hastings, New Zealand Sponsorship of Hawke’s Bay Rescue Helicopter Trust
11. QPFL Binh Dinh, Vietnam Dispatching a team of doctors to remote villages etc.

Governance

For latest information of corporate officers, click this page.

1. Structure of the Board of Directors

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Breakdown As of June 2022
Number of Directors 12
Number of Outside Directors 4
Number of Independent Outside Directors 4
Number of Female Director 2

2. Status of attendance at the Board of Director's Meeting

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Board of Director's Meeting in FY2021
Director, Chairman of the Board Susumu Yajima 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
President and CEO		 Masatoshi Kaku 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Senior Executive Officer		 Yoshiki Koseki 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Senior Executive Officer		 Hiroyuki Isono 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Senior Executive Officer		 Fumio Shindo 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Kazuhiko Kamada 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Koichi Ishida 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Shigeki Aoki 14 / 14 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Michihiro Nara 14 / 14 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Toshihisa Takata 14 / 14 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Sachiko Ai 14 / 14 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Seiko Nagai
(Appointed June 2021)		 10 / 10 (100%)

3. Structure and attendance of Nomination Committee

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Nomination Committee Meeting in FY 2021
Director, Chairman of the Board Susumu Yajima 1 / 1 (100%)
Director of the Board,
President and CEO		 Masatoshi Kaku 1 / 1 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Michihiro Nara 1 / 1 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Toshihisa Takata 1 / 1 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Sachiko Ai 1 / 1 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Seiko Nagai
(Appointed June 2021)		 1 / 1 (100%)

4. Structure and attendance of Compensation Committee

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Compensation Committee Meeting in FY 2021
Director, Chairman of the Board Susumu Yajima 2 / 2 (100%)
Director of the Board,
President and CEO		 Masatoshi Kaku 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Michihiro Nara 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Toshihisa Takata 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Sachiko Ai 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Seiko Nagai
(Appointed June 2021)		 1 / 1 (100%)

5. Structure of Audit & Supervisory Board

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Breakdown As of June 2022
Number of Audit & Supervisory Board members 5
Number of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board members 3
Number of Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board members 3

6. Status of attendance at the Audit & Supervisory Board Meeting

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Audit & Supervisory Board Meeting in FY 2021
Audit & Supervisory Board member Tomihiro Yamashita 13 / 13 (100%)
Audit & Supervisory Board member Nobuko Otsuka 13 / 13 (100%)
Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board member Mikinao Kitada 13 / 13 (100%)
Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board member Hiderou Chimori
(Appointed June 2021)		 9 / 9 (100%)
Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board member Noriko Sekiguchi
(Appointed June 2021)		 9 / 9 (100%)

7. Total amount of remuneration, etc. for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(FY2021)

Position No. of Personnel Total remuneration (million yen) Fixed remuneration (million yen) Performance-linked remuneration (million yen)
Bonuses Stock-based remuneration
Director 13 569 270 157 141
(Independent Outside Director) (4) (56) (56) (-) (-)
Audit & Supervisory Board Member 6 87 87 - -
(Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member) (4) (36) (36) (-) (-)
Total 19 657 358 157 141
  • *Note:Numbers less than one million yen are rounded down to the nearest million.

8. Remuneration of the Company's Accounting Auditors

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: million yen)

Segment FY2021
Remuneration of the Company's Accounting Auditors 120
The amount required to be paid to Accounting Auditors by the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries
Total amount of other property benefits		 301

9. Political contribution amount

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2021
Political contribution amount (1,000 yen) 938

10. Shares of the Company

11. Major shareholders top10

12. Anti-corruption

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2021
Number of staff dismissed due to non-compliance with anti-corruption policies 0
Cost of fines, penalties or settlements in relation to corruption (yen) 0
Provisions for fines and settlements in relation to corruption (yen) 0

13. Number of whistleblowing cases received

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021
Number of whistleblowing cases 119 131 114 140 138