Logo

ESG Data

ESG Data

  • Environment
  • Social
  • Governance

Environment

  • Data aggregation was performed in accordance with the Environment Accounting Guideline published by Japan's Ministry of the Environment
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Unless otherwise noted in the footnotes or tables, business sites of consolidated companies are included in the data, but non-production sites (primarily the main building, sales offices, and other sites that perform managerial and administrative work and sites where GHG and environment impact are extremely low) are excluded.
  • Aggregation period : Japan: April 1 - March 31 of each fiscal year, Overseas: January 1 - December 31 of each fiscal year (April 1 - March 31 in India and Myanmar)

1. Environment conservation cost1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: million yen)

Category Main initiatives FY2022
Investment Cost
1. Environment conservation costs for curbing environment impact generated by production and service activities within business sites 24,617 19,589
Breakdown ⅰ Environment conservation management costs Measures against air pollution, water pollution, noise and vibration, etc. 1,381 12,572
ⅱ Global environment conservation costs Cultivating company-owned forests in Japan, forest plantation operations outside Japan, energy conservation investments 21,499 746
ⅲ Resource circulation costs Efficient utilization of resources, costs for waste measures 1,736 6,271
2. Costs for curbing environment impact generated upstream or downstream by production and service activities Costs for purchasing low-sulfur fuel (balance amount) 0 299
3. Environment conservation cost related to administrative activities Employee education, ISO 14001 costs, costs for air and water analysis, costs for operating committees and other organizations, etc. 6 866
4. Environment conservation costs related to R&D activities Product development that contributes to environment conservation by promoting utilization of recovered paper, curbing environment impact that occurs during production, etc. 718 3,316
5. Environment conservation costs related to social activities Philanthropic programs, support for various environment groups, environment and sustainability reporting, Eco-Products exhibit, etc. 0 49
6. Costs related to environment damage Pollution impact levy (SOx) 0 477
Total 25,341 24,596
  • 1)Boundary of data aggregation: Companies in Japan of Oji Holdings, Oji Paper, Oji Materia, Oji F-Tex, Oji Imaging Media, Oji Nepia, Oji Cornstarch, Oji Tac, Oji Container, Morishigyo, Oji Green Resources, Oji Forest & Products

2. Economic benefit associated with environment conservation activities1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: million yen)

Effect FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Income from company-owned forests in Japan 411 415 432 428
Reduced expenses from energy saved 1,977 1,840 1,541 1,630
Income from recycling 3,542 3,439 3,552 3,612
Total 5,930 5,694 5,525 5,670
  • 1)Boundary of data aggregation: Companies in Japan of Oji Holdings, Oji Paper, Oji Materia, Oji F-Tex, Oji Imaging Media, Oji Nepia, Oji Cornstarch, Oji Tac, Oji Container, Morishigyo, Oji Green Resources, Oji Forest & Products

3. Greenhouse gas (GHG)1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY
2018		 FY
2019		 FY
2020		 FY
2021		 FY
20222)		 Target value for 2022
Scope 1 (Direct emissions) Emission (kt-CO2e) 6,394 6,323 6,267 6,398 6,399 ★ 6,282
(98.2% in FY 2021)
Intensity (t-CO2e/ million yen) 4.123 4.194 4.611 4.405 3.750
Scope 2 (Indirect emissions) Emission (kt-CO2e) 1,442 1,327 1,193 1,208 1,0713) ★ 1,186
(98.2% in FY 2021)
Intensity (t-CO2e/ million yen) 0.930 0.880 0.878 0.822 0.627
Scope 1+2 Emission (kt-CO2e) 7,836 7,650 7,460 7,606 7,470 ★ 7,468
(98.2% in FY 2021)
Intensity (t-CO2e/ Sales million yen) 5.052 5.074 5.489 5.173 4.377
Scope 1 breakdown by GHG type (kt-CO2e) CO2 6,832 6,623 6,413 6,536 6,394
CH4 148 149 149 148 148
N2O 856 878 898 922 928
HFC N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
PFC N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
SF6 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
NF3 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
Total 7,836 7,650 7,460 7,606 7,470
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2022 figures have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
    Scope 1 Calculation
    Japan: Calculated in accordance with Act on Rationalizing Energy Use and Shifting to Non-fossil Energy (Energy Conservation Act) and Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (Global Warming Act)
    • Emissions relating to the electric power business (supply of electricity or heat to other companies) and transport by Group-owned vehicles are included.
    • CO2 emissions from the use of purchased fuels made from waste are excluded.
    Overseas: Calculated based on the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative
    • Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from simply burning waste are excluded.
    • Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from waste disposal and wastewater treatment are excluded.
    • Non-energy greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions resulting from quicklime production (lime kiln) are excluded.
    Scope 2 Calculation
    Japan: Basic emissions factors of individual electric power companies published by the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry
    Overseas: IEA-published CO2 emission factors by country in 2010
  • 2)For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.
  • 3)The emission factor for purchased steam at one overseas site was changed to reflect actual conditions, resulting in a decrease of 92 kilotons of CO2e.

4. Scope 3

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: kiloton-CO2e)

Category and Coverage FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY202216)
Domestic Overseas Total Domestic Overseas Total Domestic Overseas Total Domestic Overseas Total
  1. Purchased goods and services1)
 2,489 1,278 3,766 2,158 1,272 3,430 2,322 1,341 3,663 2,229 1,441 3,670 ★
  1. Capital goods2)
 150 118 267 121 216 337 131 480 610 123 241 363
  1. Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)3)
 340 318 657 341 277 618 354 350 704 357 366 723
  1. Upstream transportation and distribution4)
 225 138 362 223 140 363 221 160 381 233 107 340
  1. Waste generated in operations5)
 18 60 77 19 12 31 23 47 69 17 21 39
  1. Business travel6)
 2 3 5 2 3 5 2 3 5 2 3 5
  1. Employee commuting7)
 8 11 19 7 11 18 7 12 19 7 12 19
  1. Upstream leased assets8)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. Downstream transportation and distribution9)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. Processing of sold products10)
 136 0 136 122 0 122 122 0 122 106 0 106
  1. Use of sold products11)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. End of life treatment of sold products12)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. Downstream leased assets13)
 ＜0.1 0 ＜0.1 ＜0.1 0 ＜0.1 ＜0.1 0 ＜0.1 ＜0.1 0 ＜0.1
  1. Franchises14)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. Investments15)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 3,366 1,924 5,290 2,993 1,931 4,924 3,181 2,392 5,573 3,074 2,191 5,264
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2022 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)Emissions associated with activities up to the point when materials/components, materials related to purchased goods and sale, etc. are manufactured. For emission intensities, we have referred to the “Emission intensity database for calculation of GHG emissions by organizations throughout the supply chain (ver. 3.2)” and the “CO2 equivalents common intensity database (ver. 4.0).”
  • 2)Emission from building and producing capital goods of our companies
  • 3)Emission from purchasing fuel, electricity, heats and generating electricity
  • 4)Emission from transportation and distribution of raw materials, parts, purchased goods and sales materials to our companies
  • 5)Emission from transportation and disposal of waste generated in our companies
  • 6)Emission from business travel of employees
  • 7)Emission from employees commuting
  • 8)Emission from operation of leased assets that our companies leased. Calculated in Scope1, 2
  • 9)Emission from operating leased assets that our companies leased. Category 4 Includes transport, delivery (upstream).
  • 10)Processing of sold products; - Emission from processing of intermediate products by business operators
  • 11)Emission from use of products by users (consumers, business operators). Since the Group's main sales products, paper products, do not use energy during use, the Group considers that GHG emissions during product use are zero.
  • 12)Emission from transportation and disposal of products when disposing by users (consumers, business operators). The Group's main sales products are paper products, which emit CO2 when discarded. However, the Group's raw materials absorb CO2 when grown, so the Group's emissions are offset and considered to be zero.
  • 13)Downstream leased assets; - Emission from operating leased assets that our companies leased.
  • 14)Emission by franchises. Since the Group is not the president of the franchise, the emissions sources falling under this category are considered to be zero.
  • 15)Emission related with investments management. Since the Group is not an investment or financial institution, zero emissions sources are considered to fall under this category.
  • 16)For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.

5. Energy consumption

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Segment FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY20226)
Fuel type of using1)
(Electric power equivalent GWh)		 Oil 4,397 3,888 3,542 3,537 3,439 4,315
Coal 8,388 8,164 7,632 7,533 7,611 6,769
Gas 4,202 4,096 4,095 3,982 4,467 5,156
Purchased energy 3,920 4,160 3,852 3,603 3,472 3,409
Waste 7,328 7,195 7,273 7,284 7,552 7,181
Subtotal: Non-renewable energy 28,235 27,503 26,394 25,939 26,502 26,831
Biomass, sludge,etc 33,037 33,076 33,024 30,130 31,615 31,963
Hydro 324 397 375 360 366 367
Solar 5 5 5 5 5 5
Subtotal: Renewable energy 33,366 33,479 33,404 30,495 31,987 32,335
Total 61,601 60,982 59,797 56,434 58,488 59,166
Total energy consumption2)
(Crude Oil equivalent)		 Consumption
(million liter)		 5,874 5,822 5,660 5,219 5,400 5,440 ★
Intensity
(kilo-liter/t-production)		 0.369 0.364 0.365 0.365 0.359 0.363
Production capacity by energy type
(MW)		 Thermal power 3) 1,622 1,622 1,697 1,697 1,697 1,846
Hydro power 72 72 72 72 72 73
Solar power 4 4 4 4 4 5
Real power generation by energy type
(GWh/ yr) 4)		 Thermal power 7,899 7,695 7,969 7,864 7,985 8,297
Hydro power 324 397 350 360 366 367
Solar power 5 5 5 5 5 5
Real power consumption
(GWh /yr)		 Total power consumption 11,121 11,100 11,091 10,757 11,006 11,202
Renewable energy power in total power consumption 4,390 4,451 4,611 4,338 4,535 4,775
Purchased power from renewable energy5) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Biomass power generation companies
Power generation capacity by type
(MW)		 Biomass power generation 51 51 126 126 126 201
Energy input
(electric power equivalent GWh)		 Coal 10.0 1.0 32.2 37.1 0.0 0.0
Oil 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.0 1.4
Biomass 402.2 414.3 668.1 968.9 986.1 1,140.1
Implied reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by FIT electric power sales6)
Implied reduction [kt-CO2e] 480 ★
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2022 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)Fuel type of using is calculted as follows.
    Fuel input calories (TJ) are converted to GWh by dividing by 3.6 (TJ/GWh).
    Energy input relating to the electric power business (supply of electricity or heat to other parties) is included.
    Energy input relating to transport by Group-owned vehicles is excluded.
    Energy relating to the supply of electric power or heat to other parties is excluded from fossil fuel and non-fossil fuel derived energy.
    The sources of unit calorific values are the following laws and international standards.
    Japan: Act on Rationalizing Energy use and Shifting to Non-fossil Energy and Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures
    Overseas: IPCC 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
    For comparability with the reduction targets, the unit calorific values for non-fossil fuels are the same as those used for FY2018.
  • 2)Energy consumption: Energy consumption in conjunction with the manufacture of products is calculated excluding the following energy use.
    Consumption relating to the electric power business (supply of electricity or heat to other parties) and transport by Group-owned vehicles is excluded.
    Energy relating to the supply of electric power or heat to other parties is excluded from fossil fuel and non-fossil fuel derived energy.
    The sources of unit calorific values are the following laws and international standards.
    Japan: Act on Rationalizing Energy use and Shifting to Non-fossil Energy and Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures
    Overseas: IPCC 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
    For comparability with the reduction targets, the unit calorific values for non-fossil fuels are the same as those used for FY2018.
  • 3)Thermal Power Generation by the Group
    • Thermal power generation includes power generation capacity of spare facilities. Thermal power generation refers to the sum of oil, coal, gas, waste and biomass burning alone and mixed burning.
  • 4)Performance of the Group's Power Generation
    • The total amount of electricity consumed and sold in-house is shown in the figure.
  • 5)Enter the amount of purchased electricity that can be proved to be derived from renewable energy, such as the Green Power Certification.
  • 6)The amount of reduction is estimated based on the premise that electric power sale under the Feed-in Tariff (FIT) scheme for renewable energy indirectly reduces the CO2 emissions associated with electric power users.
    Implied reduction = amount of FIT electric power sales x national average emission factor
    FIT electric power sales: The amount of electricity from biomass, hydroelectric, and solar power generation sold under the FIT scheme by Group companies in Japan
    National average emission factor: An emission factor used in the calculation of the equivalent amount of CO2 reduced by using non-fossil electric power under the greenhouse gas emissions calculation, reporting, and disclosure system
  • 7)For sites that had trouble in collecting data due to natural disasters, FY2022 data are estimates calculated using production volumes and actual FY2019-2021 data.

6. Acquisition status of environment management system (EMS)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment As of March 31, 2020 As of March 31, 2021 As of March 31, 2022 As of March 31, 2023
Number of sites covered by ISO14001 148 148 148 149
Percentage of sites covered by ISO14001 (%) 52 50 50 51

7. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Number of environment-related violations1) 2 0 3 5
Administrative penalties, including environment-related fines and suspensions of operations No occurrence No occurrence No occurrence No occurrence
  • 1)Violation of environmental laws and regulations regarding water withdrawal, wastewater, air, waste, etc.
    The external impact of the violation is minor and has not caused any complaints from local residents.

8. Environmental burden substances1) (BOD, COD, and SS) in wastewater and drainage amount

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY20223) Target value for 2022
BOD emission (t) 7,860 7,740 7,567 7,013 5,615 -
Emission intensity (kg/ t-production) 0.49 0.50 0.53 0.47 0.37 -
(kg/million yen) 5.07 5.13 5.57 4.77 3.29 -
Emission intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate2) (base year) 1.3% 9.9% -5.9% -35.1% -
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) (base year) Not achieved
(5.00)		 Not achieved
(4.93)		 Achieved
(4.87)		 Achieved
(4.80)		 -
COD emission (t) 34,932 35,038 32,897 35,862 34,610 33,084
Emission intensity (kg/ t-production) 2.19 2.26 2.30 2.38 2.31 -
(kg/million yen) 22.52 23.24 24.21 24.39 20.28 -
Emission intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate2) (base year) 3.2% 7.5% 8.3% -10.0% -
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) (base year) Not achieved
(22.22)		 Not achieved
(21.92)		 Not achieved
(21.62)		 Achieved
(21.33)		 -
SS emission (t) 16,398 16,391 14,639 14,710 13,715 -
Emission intensity (kg/ t-production) 1.03 1.06 1.02 0.98 0.91 -
(kg/million yen) 10.57 10.87 10.77 10.01 8.04 -
Emission intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate2) (base year) 2.8% 1.9% -5.4% -24.0% -
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) (base year) Not achieved
(10.43)		 Not achieved
(10.29)		 Achieved
(10.15)		 Achieved
(10.01)		 -
Total wastewater (1,000 m3) 708,494 701,024 671,965 675,849 672,780 ★ -
Wastewater destination River and lake 280,690 277,848 272,227 269,339 255,783 -
Sea 354,651 354,108 339,423 343,993 339,329 -
Groundwater 2 2 10 8 18 -
Sewer 73,150 69,065 60,305 62,509 77,649 -
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2022 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)BOD (Biochemical oxygen demand), COD (Chemical oxygen demand), SS (Suspended solids)
    Boundary of data aggregation; all consolidated companies that be regulated with wastewater.
  • 2)Emissions intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate target: Reduce by 15% in FY 2030 compared to FY 2018
  • 3)For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.

9. Amount of environment burden substances in emitted gas1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY20224)
SOx emission (t) 6,394 5,704 5,529 5,424 5,955
Emission intensity (kg/t-production) 0.40 0.37 0.39 0.36 0.40
(kg/million yen) 4.12 3.78 4.07 3.69 3.49
Emission intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate2) (base year) -8.2% -1.3% -10.5% -15.4%
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) (base year) Achieved
(4.07)		 Not achieved
(4.01)		 Achieved
(3.96)		 Achieved
(3.90)
NOx emission (t) 11,744 13,024 10,958 12,385 11,595
Emission intensity (kg/t-production) 0.74 0.84 0.77 0.82 0.77
(kg/million yen) 7.57 8.64 8.06 8.42 6.79
Dust emission (t) 2,944 3,097 3,148 3,143 2,800
Emission intensity (kg/t-production) 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.21 0.19
(kg/million yen) 1.90 2.05 2.32 2.14 1.64
VOC emission (t) 523 481 227 232 182 ★
Emission intensity3) (kg/t-production) 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01
(kg/million yen) 0.34 0.32 0.17 0.16 0.11
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2022 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)Boundary of data aggregation
    • SOx, NOx and Dust: all consolidated companies that be regulated.
    • VOC: Domestic Group companies subject to Japanese Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR) law have been included. Of the substances subject to PRTR law, those corresponding to the 100 types of VOC indicated by the Ministry of the Environment based on the Air Pollution Control Act have been included.
  • 2)Emissions intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate target: Reduce by 15% in FY 2030 compared to FY 2018
  • 3)Emissions intensity (kg/million yen) target: 0.305 (FY 2010 performance x 50%) or less
  • 4)For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.

10. Waste and PRTR chemical substances

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY20224)
Industrial waste generation1) Domestic (kt) 1,494 1,517 1,458 1,347 1,410 1,420
Overseas (kt) 1,288 1,358 1,299 1,386 1,363 1,569
Total (kt) 2,782 2,875 2,757 2,733 2,772 2,989 ★
Generation intensity (kg/t-production) 174.7 180.0 177.8 191.0 184.3 199.3
(kg/million yen) 1,872 1,854 1,829 2,011 1,886 1,752
Efficient use amount (kt) 2,617 2,708 2,586 2,570 2,611 2,720
Landfill amount (Final disposal amount) Domestic (kt) 25 25 23 17 13 9
Overseas (kt) 140 141 149 146 149 260
Total (kt) 165 166 172 163 161 269
Landfill intensity (kg/t-production) 10.4 10.4 11.1 11.4 10.7 17.9
(kg/million yen) 111 107 114 120 110 158
Effective waste utilization rate2) Domestic (%) 98.3 98.3 98.4 98.8 99.1 99.4
Overseas (%) 89.1 89.6 88.5 89.4 89.1 83.4
Hazardous waste generation amount (t) 23,252 14,059 8,723 11,832 8,623 11,197
Generation intensity (kg/t-production) 1.46 0.88 0.56 0.83 0.57 0.75
(kg/million yen) 15.6 9.06 5.79 8.71 5.87 6.56
PRTR Chemical substance released amount and transferred amount3) (t) 826 787 750 440 482 420
Released and transferred intensity (kg/t-production) 0.052 0.049 0.048 0.031 0.032 0.028
(kg/million yen) 0.56 0.51 0.50 0.32 0.33 0.25
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2022 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)The volume of waste generated includes valuable materials (general waste is not included).
  • 2)Effective waste utilization ratio = (Amount of waste generated − Amount of landfill waste) ÷ Amount of waste generated × 100
    Target: 99% or more in Japan, 95% or more overseas in FY 2030
  • 3)PRTR data cover all consolidated companies that submit the notifications of PRTR
  • 4)For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.

11. Amounts of substances subject to the PRTR Law released and transferred

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(FY 2022)

Chemical Substance (unit) Handled amount including generated amount Amount Released Amount Transferred Total Amount
Zinc compounds (water-soluble) (t) 7.6 0.02 0.9 0.9
Acrylic acid and its water-soluble salt (t) - - - -
n-Butyl Acrylate (t) 4.4 0.19 0.5 0.7
Methyl acrylate (t) - - - -
2-Aminoethanol (t) 12.2 0.004 0.1 0.1
Asbestos (t) 3.8 - 3.7 3.7
Isoprene (t) 9.4 0.1 - 0.1
Ethylbenzene (t) 4.8 0.20 0.3 0.5
Ethylene oxide (t) 1.7 0.01 - 0.01
Ferric chloride (t) 124.8 - - -
Xylene (t) 26.4 0.4 0.6 1.0
Chromium and trivalent chromium compounds (t) 24.0 0.003 0.01 0.01
Chloroform (t) 12.7 12.6 0.002 12.6
Vinyl acetate (t) 345.2 0.7 0.6 1.3
Cyclohexylamine (t) 1.4 1.4 - 1.4
2,2-Dibromo-2-cyanoacetamide (t) 62.3 28.8 0.3 29.0
Styrene (t) 56.0 - 0.2 0.2
Dioxins (mg-TEQ) 701.7 182.6 519.1 701.7
Decanoic acid (t) - - - -
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (t) 6.3 3.8 - 3.8
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (t) 17.2 0.06 0.02 0.08
Toluene (t) 1,702.4 149.4 158.1 307.5
Hexamethylene diacrylate (t) 2.7 - - -
Nickel (t) 12.8 0.006 0.006 0.01
Oxin copper(t) - - - -
Methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate (t) 1.8 0.14 0.2 0.3
Phenol (t) 3.6 0.01 0.1 0.1
Hydrogen fluoride（ton） 5.2 5.20 - 5.2
n-Hexane (t) 11.3 0.13 0.1 0.2
Benzene (t) 18.1 16.6 - 16.6
Boron compounds (t) 238.7 19.8 1 21.1
Poly (oxyethylene) alkyl ether (alkyl C=12-15) (t) 2.8 1.7 0.1 1.8
Sodium poly (oxyethylene) dodecyl ether sulfate (t) 8.3 5.0 - 5.0
Formaldehyde (t) 1.1 0.8 0.01 0.8
Manganese and its compounds (t) 4.6 4.6 - 4.6
Methylnaphthalene (t) 295.8 1.5 - 1.5
Methylenebis (4.1-phenylene) = diisocyanate (t) 3.0 - 0.1 0.1
Total 3,033 253 167 420
  • The Data covers all consolidated companies that submit the notifications of PRTR.
  • Excluding dioxins, numbers prepared for substances of which one ton or more (0.5 tons or more Specified Class 1 Designated Chemical Substances) is handled ( including amount produced).

12. Usage of main raw materials1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Main raw materials FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY20222)
Woodchip and lumber (kt) 13,432 13,171 11,940 12,421 12,748
Recovered paper (kt) 4,343 4,339 4,374 4,411 4,699
Pulp (kt) 341 328 312 308 313
Purchased containerboard and corrugated sheet (kt) 3,309 3,262 3,212 3,424 3,562
Total (kt) 21,425 21,100 19,838 20,564 21,321
  • 1)Amount includes intra-group transaction
  • 2)For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.

13. Water resource

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY20222) Target value for 2022
Water intake (1,000 m3) 740,398 736,684 706,298 714,281 709,966 ★ 725,118
Water intake intensity (m3/ t-production) 46.4 47.5 49.3 47.5 47.3 -
(m3/ million yen) 477.4 488.6 519.7 485.9 416.0 -
Water intake intensity (m3/million yen) reduction rate1) (base year) 2.4% 8.9% 1.8% -12.9% -
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) (base year) Not achieved
(474.9)		 Not achieved
(472.4)		 Not achieved
(470.0)		 Achieved
(467.5)		 -
Breakdown of water intake
(1,000 m3)		 Surface water
(river, lake, sea, brackish water)		 487,936 483,096 476,998 480,023 466,562 -
Groundwater
(well water, subsoil water)		 151,295 147,125 127,843 127,039 130,780 -
Third party organization
(water supply, city water)		 101,168 106,463 101,457 107,219 112,624 -
Recycled water amount (1,000 m3) 694,746 687,411 654,924 661,865 659,258 -
Recycled ratio (%) 94% 93% 93% 93% 93% -

Changes in water consumption

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY20222)
Water intake (1,000 m3) 740,398 736,684 706,298 714,281 709,966
Wastewater (1,000 m3) 708,494 701,024 671,965 675,849 672,780
Water consumption (1,000 m3) 31,904 35,659 34,333 38,432 37,186
Water consumption intensity (m3/t-production) 2.00 2.30 2.40 2.55 2.48
(m3/ million yen) 20.57 23.65 25.26 26.14 21.79
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2022 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)Water intake intensity (m3/million yen) reduction rate target: Reduce by 6% in 2030 compared to FY 2018
  • 2)For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.

14. Water intensity in electric power business1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2021
Gross generation (MWh) 415,631 700,887 1,006,844 986,135 1,141,497
Water intake (m3) 1,537,505 2,090,868 2,662,414 2,684,595 3,095,703
Water intensity (m3/MWh) 3.70 2.98 2.64 2.72 2.71
  • 1) Electric power companies (Oji Green Energy Nichinan Co. Ltd., Oji Green Energy Ebetsu Co. Ltd., Oji Green Energy Tokushima Co., Ltd., MPM Oji Eco Energy Co., Ltd.)

15. Recovered paper utilization

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Paper and paperboard production amount1) Paper (kt) 3,011 2,902 2,287 2,441 2,412
Paperboard (kt) 3,190 3,201 3,116 3,189 3,316
Total (kt) 6,202 6,104 5,403 5,630 5,728
Recovered paper used amount2) Paper (kt) 911 872 728 661 624
Paperboard (kt) 3,170 3,138 3,098 3,174 3,182
Total (kt) 4,081 4,010 3,826 3,834 3,806
Recovered paper utilization ratio2) Paper (%) 29.9 30.9 30.9 27.6 27.5
Paperboard (%) 95.2 95.4 95.9 95.4 94.8
Total (%) 64.0 65.6 68.5 67.1 67.6
Target2) (%) 65.0 65.0 65.0 70.0 70.0
Achievement rate (%) 98.4 100.9 105.3 95.8 96.6
  • 1)Paper and paperboard production amount in Japan
  • 2)Aggregation period: From January to December for the amount of recovered paper use, from April to March for recovered paper utilization ratio
    Scope of data aggregation: Companies in Japan of Oji Paper, Oji Materia, Oji F-Tex, Oji Nepia
    Recovered paper utilization ratio = Volume of recovered paper consumed ÷ Total volume of fiber raw materials consumed (total consumption of recovered paper, wood pulp, and other fiber raw materials)
    Target for recovered paper utilization ratio: 65% from FY2016 to FY2020, 70% or above from FY2021 to FY2030

16. Environment-related data by segment

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(FY2021)

Operating
sites		 Production
(kt)		 GHG Water
resource		 Industrial
waste		 Domestic
chemical
substances		 Environmental
burden
in wastewater		 Environmental
burden
in emission gas
Emissio
(kt-CO2e)		 Intensity
(tCO2e/ t-production)		 Water intake
(1,000 m3)		 Intensity
(m3/ t-production)		 Final disposal amount
(t-Appearance)		 Intensity
(kg/ t-production)		 PRTR chemical substances
(t-released and transferred)		 Intensity
(g/ t-production)		 BOD
(t)		 COD
(t)		 SS
(t)		 SOx
(t-SO2 conversion)		 NOx
(t-NO2 conversion)		 Soot and Dust
(t)
Industrial Material Business
169 6,787 2,975 0.438 192,939 28.4 70,190 10.3 122 18 2,277 3,905 1,922 2,376 2,637 177
Household and Consumer Product Business
8 210 112 0.534 3,560 17.0 76 0.4 <1 0.1 (*1) 99 21 <1 8 4
Functional Materials Business
26 627 531 0.847 42,688 68.1 10,359 16.5 248 395 367 151 201 309 261 10
Forest Resources and Environment Marketing Business
45 3,941 982 0.249 117,914 29.9 183,417 46.5 <1 0.05 2,125 11,822 4,534 246 2,980 2,243
Printing and Communications Media Business
7 3,411 2,847 0.835 352,306 103.3 4,874 1.4 49 14 840 18,633 7,035 3,024 5,708 366
Other business
35 21 23 1.098 559 26.5 237 11.3 1 60 6 0 2 0 0 0
Total (consolidated companies)
290 14,997 7,470 0.498 709,966 47.3 269,153 17.9 420 28 5,615 34,610 13,715 5,955 11,595 2,800
  • Production volume includes the volume of transactions within the group.
  • See note under "3. Greenhouse Gases (GHG)" for the calculation method of GHG emissions.
  • The environmental impact (BOD, COD, SS) of water emissions and the environmental impact (SOx, NOx, soot and dust) of air emissions are the amounts of emissions from business sites to which regulations are applied.
  • For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.
  • Note:(*1) Emissions not listed because there are no sites where regulations are applied.
Click here to see the results for fiscal years 2018-2021.

17. Forest certification acquisition rate1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Overseas Forest Plantations Forest Certification Area (ha) 217,521 222,545 211,907 213,821 237,328
Forest Certification Rate 92% 94% 91% 92% 94%
Company-owned Forests in Japan (excluding shared forests) Forest Certification Area (ha) 172,641 172,641 172,635 172,625 172,625
Forest Certification Rate 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Overall forest certification rate 95% 96% 95% 95% 96%
  • 1)Overseas: Area ratio in company-owned production forests, Japan: Area ratio in company-owned forests excluding shared forests

18. Oji Group forest area

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

As of March 2022

Country （Area) Operating company / Business overview Year established Production forests (ha) Conseveation forests (ha) Total(ha) Forest certification code
New Zealand (South Island) Southland Plantation Forest Company of New Zealand Ltd. (SPFL) 1992 10,221 3,067 13,288 NC-FM/COC-001130
FM: FM107252/CoC: CoC107252
Australia (Western Australia) Albany Plantation Forest Company of Australia Ltd. (APFL) 1993 4,641 1,325 5,966 SA-CW/FM-006020
Vietnam（Bin Dinh) Quy Nhon Plantation Forest Company of Vietnam Ltd. (QPFL) 1995 8,661 1,000 9,661 SGSCH-FM/COC-002539
Australia (Victoria) Green Triangle  Plantation Forest Company of Australia Pty. Ltd. (GPFL) 1997 2,802 2,802  
Indonesia (Kalimantan) PT Korintiga Hutani (KTH) 1998 62,839 19,139 81,978 SGS-CW/FM-009866
AJA/IFCC-PEFC/FMC-HT/00038/1/2018
Vietnam (Phu Yen) Truong Thanh Oji Plantation Forest Company Limited （TTO) 2011 2,248 254 2,502 SGS-FM/COC-011627
Brazil (Minas Gerais) Celulose Nipo-Brasileira S.A (CENIBRA) 1973 144,553 105,829 250,382 IMA-FM/COC-007629
IMA-COC-007630/IMA-CW-007630
New Zealand (North island) Pan Pac Forest Products Ltd. (PAN PAC) 1971 35,864 5,090 40,954 SGS-FM/COC-000850
BR021517-1
New Zealand (North island) Oji Fibre Solutions (OjiFS) 2014 6,933 548 7,481  
Overseas subtotal 278,762 136,253 415,014  
Japan 176,267 11,552 187,819 SGEC-FM: JAFTA-002, JAFTA-008, JAFTA-012
SGEC-CoC: JAFTA-W025
Total 455,030 147,805 602,833  

19. Procurement volume of wood chips and market pulp for Oji Group

Wood chip

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Origin FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 Raw material composition
(k BDT) (%) (k BDT) (%) (k BDT) (%) (k BDT) (%)
Japan 943.1 20% 775.1 21% 813.0 18% 774.0 17% Sawmill residue
Vietnam 922.2 19% 737.3 20% 1,018.4 23% 980.8 21% Planted tree
Thailand 964.4 20% 697.5 19% 750.4 17% 949.5 21% Planted tree
Indonesia 349.2 7% 364.1 10% 440.5 10% 425.0 9% Planted tree
Australia 649.3 13% 358.5 10% 562.8 13% 735.7 16% Planted tree
U.S.A. 253.0 5% 243.7 7% 284.2 6% 326.1 7% Sawmill residue
Chile 293.8 6% 189.7 5% 238.8 5% 175.3 4% Planted tree
New Zealand 148.2 3% 109.0 3% 162.6 4% 115.2 2% Planted tree
Malaysia 141.0 3% 98.3 3% 64.8 1% 54.8 1% Planted tree
Fiji 94.2 2% 88.6 22% 93.8 2% 85.8 2% Planted tree
South Africa 76.4 2% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% Planted tree
Total 4,834.7 100% 3,661.8 100% 4,429.3 100% 4,622.2 100%  

Market pulp

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Origin FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 Raw material composition
(k ADT) (%) (k ADT) (%) (k ADT) (%) (k ADT) (%)
Brazil 66.5 34% 64.6 48% 81.6 50% 109.3 60% Planted tree
New Zealand 67.7 35% 35.4 27% 35.2 22% 0.3 0% Planted tree, Sawmil residue
Canada 34.0 17% 18.0 13% 15.5 10% 18.2 10% Regrowth forest
Japan 12.1 6% 8.5 6% 17.4 11% 36.6 20% Sawmill residue
Sweden 8.5 4% 3.8 3% 5.4 3% 11.0 6% Regrowth forest
U.S.A 5.2 3% 2.6 2% 3.6 2% 3.6 2% Planted tree, Sawmil residue
Finland 0.4 0% 0.4 0% 1.8 1% 1.5 1% Regrowth forest
Chile 0.0 0% 0.2 0% 1.1 1% 2.0 1% Planted tree
Total 194.4 100% 133.5 100% 161.6 100% 182.5 100%  
  • We have confirmed that the wood chips and the market pulp are wood raw materials that meet FSCC™ certifiied materials and FSCC™ requirements.

20. Carbon stocks and net increment in carbon stocks by production and conservation forest

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 Average
Carbon stocks1) 4) 5) (kt-CO2) 110,105 112,081 115,362 119,415 122,453 -
Net increment in carbon stocks2) 4) 5) (kt-CO2/yr) 741 309 740 2,262 587 928
Forest area covered3) 4) 5) (1,000 ha) 545 542 537 549 549 -
  • 1)Actual carbon stocks in living biomass
  • 　 Production forest: Actual merchantable volume at the end of each fiscal year x Biomass expansion coefficient x (1+underground / above-ground ratio) x Wood density x Carbon ratio x CO2 conversion coefficient.
  • 　 Conservation forest: Remaining area at the end of each fiscal year x above-ground biomass of natural forest x (1+underground / above-ground ratio) x carbon ratio x CO2 conversion coefficient.
  • 2)Net increment in carbon stocks by forests
    Production forest: CO2 absorption by growth - CO2 emission by felling
  • 　 Conservation forest: Remaining area at the end of each fiscal year x Annual growth rate of above-ground biomass x (1+underground / above-ground ratio) x carbon ratio x CO2 conversion coefficient.
  • 3)Forest area in the scope of calculation for carbon stocks and net increment in carbon stocks covers consolidated companies in line with GHG emissions.
  • 4)From 2021, for CNB, the calculated value (third-party guarantee) by CNB was applied to the overall total. Revised in the same way for 2018-2020.
  • 5)KTH was consolidated in FY2022. KTH data was also added to the FY 2018-2021 data.

21. Net GHG emissions

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2018
(Base year)		 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 Average
GHG emissions (Scope 1+2) (kt-CO2e/yr) 7,836 7,650 7,460 7,606 7,470 7,604
Net increment in carbon stocks (kt-CO2e/yr) 741 309 740 2,262 587 928
Net GHG emissions (kt-CO2e/yr) 7,095 7,341 6,720 5,344 6,883 6,676
GHG reduction rate - -6% -14% -32% -12% -15%

22. Environmental conservation activities

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Country Area Group company Program
Japan Hokkaido Oji Forest & Products Sarufutsu Itou Conservation Activities
Japan Kochi Oji Forest & Products Measures to Protect the Fairy Pitta (Koyagauchi company-owned forest in Kochi Prefecture)
Japan Hokkaido Oji Forest & Products Conservation activities for endangered alpine plants
Japan Yamanashi Oji Forest & Products Lily-of-the-Valley Habitat Conservation
Brazil Minas Gerais CENIBRA Mutumu Project
Brazil Minas Gerais CENIBRA Initiatives for preserving biodiversity
New Zealand Hawke's Bay Pan Pac Conservation activity for Kiwi
New Zealand Hawke's Bay Pan Pac Efforts to preserve and restore indigenous forest
New Zealand Hawke's Bay Pan Pac Efforts to restore indigenous forest in privately owned land
New Zealand Hawke's Bay Pan Pac Efforts to improve water quality and biodiversity by restoring riverside vegetation
New Zealand Southland SPFL Rare, Threatened and Endangered (RTE) species

Social

1. Employees

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Boundary of data aggregation As of Mar 31,
2019		 As of Mar 31,
2020		 As of Mar 31,
2021		 As of Mar 31,
2022		 As of Mar 31,
2023
Number of permanent employees Consolidated 36,309 36,810 36,034 35,608 36,348
Number of temporary employees Consolidated 2,705 2,507 2,335 2,467 4,942
Men and women rates (%) Consolidated (Male) 80.99 81.45 81.39 81.34 83.97
Consolidated (Female) 19.01 18.55 18.61 18.66 17.03
Permanent employees voluntary turnover rates (%) Oji HD 1) 4.21 3.48 4.61 5.06 5.40
Oji MO 2) 2.20 3.85 1.47 2.94 5.88
  • 1) Oji HD; Oji Holdings Corporation (Non-consolidated)
  • 2) Oji MO; Oji Management Office Inc.

2. Percentage of female managers1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Percentage of female managers (%) 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.6 ★
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2022 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1) Aggregation date: March 31 of each fiscal year
    Boundary of data aggregation: 16 Group companies in Japan (with 301 or more employees at the beginning of aggregation in September 2015)
    Percentage of female managers = Number of female managers ÷ Number of all managers

3. Percentage of female hirees for generalist-track positions

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Number of of female hirees for generalist-track positions Number of of male hirees for generalist-track positions Total Percentage of female hirees for generalist-track positions (%)
FY2018 18 18 36 38.3
FY2019 18 18 36 34
FY2020 15 15 30 30.6
FY2021 15 35 50 30
FY2022 16 24 40 40
FY2023 20 33 53 37.7
  • Oji Management Office batch recruitment (excluding sports recruits)

4. Employment rate of people with disabilities1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Six applicable Group companies in Japan (%) 2.17 2.27 2.31 2.35 2.51 ★
81 companies in Japan (%) 1.91 2.01 2.04 2.10 2.20 ★
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2022 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1) Aggregation date: June 1 after each fiscal year
    Boundary of data aggregation
    • Six applicable Group companies in Japan: Oji Holdings, Oji Nepia, Oji Imaging Media, Oji Paper, Oji Management Office, and Oji Clean Mate
    • Eighty-one companies in Japan: Eighty-one companies in Japan that have at least 43.5 employees and are required to hire at least one person with disabilities under the FY2023 statutory employment rate of 2.3% (including the six applicable Group companies)
    Employment rate of people with disabilities (actual employment rate) = Number of regular workers with physical or intellectual impairments or with mental illness ÷ Number of all regular workers (Workers with short working hours are counted as 0.5 workers and persons with severe disabilities are counted as two persons)

5. Annual total working hours

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Annual total working hours
(hours / person-year)		 1,825 1,827 1,819 1,843 1,830
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Oji Group Tokyo Headquarters Area (26 companies)

6. Human rights violations

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Number of human rights violations (cases) 6 4 4 2 4
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Consolidated companies in Japan

7. Number of worksites acquired OHSAS18001 certification

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Domestic and overseas As of October 2019*1 As of May 2020*2 As of May 2021*3 As of May 2022*4 As of May 2023*5
Number of worksites acquired OHSAS18001 certification / Number of all worksites Domestic 0 (239) 0 (240) 0 (240) 0 (245) 0 (241)
Overseas 9 (70) 3 (69) 0 (71) 0 (69) 0 (74)
  • ・Boundary of data aggregation: Consolidated companies
  • *Note:At the same time as renew the OHSAS 18001 certification, it does not include the worksites that have acquired ISO 45001 certification. (*1;2 sites, *2;4 sites, *3;8 sites, *4;0 sites).
  • Currently, 10 worksites of the Oji Group have acquired ISO 45001 certification.

8. Lost time injury frequency rate and severity rate for safety

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
LTIFR1) Oji Group Whole Group 0.89 0.88 0.81 0.97 1.11 ★
Japan 0.76 0.67 0.76 0.84 0.86 ★
Overseas 1.01 1.08 0.85 1.09 1.29 ★
Manufacturing3) 1.20 1.20 1.21 1.31 1.25
Pulp, paper and paper product manufacturing3) 1.88 1.94 1.54 1.85 1.59
Severity rate2) Oji Group Whole Group 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.05 0.35
Japan 0.03 0.22 0.23 0.05 0.49
Overseas 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.25
Manufacturing3) 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.08
Pulp, paper and paper product manufacturing3) 0.22 0.63 0.39 0.06 0.19
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2022 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • ・Aggregation period: From January 1 to December 31, Boundary of data aggregation: Oji Holdings Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries
  • 1)LTIFR
    • LTIFR = (the number of lost time injuries ÷ total working hours) × 1,000,000
    • Until 2021, total working hours were calculated based on the number of Group company employees (regular employees and temporary/non-regular employees) as of the end of September, assuming the annual working hours per person is 2,000 hours. Beginning in 2022, actual total working hours until the end of December as reported by the companies have been used. Calculated using the method used up to 2021, LTIFR for FY2022 would be 1.25, 0.98, and 1.46 for whole Group, Japan, and overseas, respectively.
  • 2)Severity rate
    • Severity rate = (Number of workday lost ÷ total work hours) x 1,000
    • Number of workday lost: Fatalities and severe incidents =7,500 days, temporary work lost = lost calendar days x 300/365
  • 3)Manufacturing, Pulp, paper and paper product manufacturing:
    • The data is quoted from an occupational accident survey (investigator: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, target worksites: 100 or more employees).

9. Lost time incidents and fatalities

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Number of work related lost time incidents1) Oji Group Whole Group 69 68 61 74 88
Japan (Permanent employees) 24 21 25 25 20
Japan (Non permanent employees) 6 4 2 6 8
Overseas (Permanent employees) 38 43 34 43 60
Overseas (Non permanent employees) 1 0 0 0 0
Contractors2) Whole Group 20 10 9 10 5
Japan 20 10 9 10 5
Overseas - - - - -
Number of work related fatalities Oji Group Whole Group 0 1 1 0 3
Japan (Permanent employees) 0 1 1 0 2
Japan (Non permanent employees) 0 0 0 0 0
Overseas (Permanent employees) 0 0 0 0 1
Overseas (Non permanent employees) 0 0 0 0 0
Contractors2) Whole Group 1 0 0 0 0
Japan 1 0 0 0 0
Overseas 0 0 0 0 0
Occasional entering contractors3) Whole Group 2 1 2 0 0
Japan 1 0 1 0 0
Overseas 1 1 1 0 0
  • Aggregation period: January 1 to December 31
  • Boundary of data aggregation: consolidated companies,contractors,occasional entering contractors
  • 1)Work related lost time incident :If 2 persons injured at one time,it counts 2.
  • 2)Contractors: affiliates being resident on the Group’s premises(non-consolidate companies in Oji Group and non-Oji Group companies)
  • 3)Occasional entering contractors: Business operators who enter the Group’s premises on a temporary basis.

10. Oji Group safety and health education records (in Japan)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Safety and Health Education programs FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
1. General Safety and Health Managers Seminar, Overall safety and health controller, Safety and Health Seminar for Top management 18 10 8 25 6
2. Education at the Time of appointment of a Safety Officer (including complementary education) 136 155 98 82 123
3. Health Officer education (including complementary education) 6 20 13 12 16
4. Safety and Health Promoter education (for worksites less than 50 workers) 10 24 14 7 19
5. Foremen, etc. education/Safety and Health Controller education (including Capacity development) , RodoshoSafety and Health Education Trainer 1,069 371 206 314 404
6. Education at the time of employment (for new employees) 1,165 1,031 655 828 934
7. Education for relocated and transferred employees 352 271 422 456 372
8. Skill training course (Operations Chief or training for restricted employment) 1,629 1,137 776 1,162 996
9. Special education (Education for safety and health to those who are currently engaged in dangerous or harmful work) 736 2,289 1,063 1,674 961
10. Risk assessment training 280 264 217 427 260
11. OSHMS (Occupational Safety and Health Management System) related education/training 76 33 27 45 37
12. Machine safety education 291 84 39 1 23
13. Chemical Management education - 307 229 117 141
14. Work-related          
  Safety and Health education for workers in charge of dangerous or harmful work (except for Special Education) 240 225 213 369 169
Safety education on heavy machines including forklifts 3,917 4,222 2,327 2,796 4,112
Danger and safety sensory education (Including education with virtual reality devices) 2,920 2,013 14,172 12,776 10,637
Health and safety education on dangerous chemicals/powder substances (powder dust) 1,278 280 590 666 208
Safety education on electricity/education for workers responsible for power control 1,220 1,033 1,050 941 1,075
Health and safety education on ionizing radiation 995 353 320 401 306
Others 195 469 395 40 19
15. For each rank          
  Health and safety education 1- 5 years after joining the company 87 842 894 1,482 947
Health and safety education for junior workers 745 262 334 203 84
Health and safety education for middle/senior-level workers 2,018 1,774 1,182 1,497 1,409
Health and safety education for general workers 131 588 915 1,114 839
Health and safety education for managers and supervisors 494 1,056 808 1,086 994
Education for employees in charge of safety education (including instructors) 114 229 197 183 232
Others - 294 67 906 193
16. Training and lecture          
  KYT training/ KYT leader training (KYT: Kiken Yochi Training (Hazard Prediction training)) 71 263 234 94 23
First aid training (including AED (Automated External Defibrillator)) 353 909 292 223 325
Prevention of heatstroke 2,032 9,900 6,291 4,444 4,327
Mental health and Health promotion 127 947 559 536 461
Traffic safety 2,348 6,276 3,225 4,098 4,938
Others 517 7,100 4,714 3,329 3,567
17. Other (education on a variety of qualifications and work) 1,677 709 774 277 940
18. Other (fire and earthquake drill) - 9,598 11,028 10,887 12,389
Total 27,247 55,338 54,348 53,498 52,486
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Consolidated companies in Japan, but does not include some non-production bases (head offices, sales offices, etc., which are primarily responsible for administrative affairs).

11. Social contribution

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Total Amount of corporate donations (million yen) 435 225 119 279 415
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Consolidated companies

12. Social contribution activities

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Group company Country/ Area Program
1. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Partnerships with Beekeepers
2. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Farming partnerships
3. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Effective council -Childhood and Adolescence, The elderly
4. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Entrepreneur Training Program
5. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil UNIECO - Company-Community Integration Units
6. Pan Pac Napier, New Zealand Whakatipu Kaitiaki - Raising Future Kaitiaki
7. Pan Pac Hastings, New Zealand Esk River Restoration
8. Pan Pac Hawke's Bay, New Zealand Kākābeak/Ngutukākā Propagation
9. Pan Pac Maungataniwha, New Zealand Maungataniwha Forest Regeneration
10. Pan Pac Hastings, New Zealand Sponsorship of Hawke’s Bay Rescue Helicopter Trust
11. QPFL Binh Dinh, Vietnam Dispatching a team of doctors to remote villages etc.

Governance

For latest information of corporate officers, click this page.

1. Structure of the Board of Directors

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Breakdown As of June 2023
Number of Directors 12
Number of Outside Directors 4
Number of Independent Outside Directors 4
Number of Female Director 2

2. Status of attendance at the Board of Director's Meeting

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Board of Director's Meeting in FY2022
Director, Chairman of the Board Masatoshi Kaku 15 / 15 (100%)
Director of the Board,
President and CEO		 Hiroyuki Isono 15 / 15 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Vice President		 Fumio Shindo 15 / 15 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Senior Executive Officer		 Kazuhiko Kamada 15 / 15 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Shigeki Aoki 15 / 15 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Akio Hasebe 11 / 11 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Takayuki Moridaira 11 / 11 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Yuji Onuki 11 / 11 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Michihiro Nara 15 / 15 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Sachiko Ai 15 / 15 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Seiko Nagai 15 / 15 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Hiromichi Ogawa 11 / 11 (100%)

3. Structure and attendance of Nomination Committee

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Nomination Committee Meeting in FY 2022
Director, Chairman of the Board Masatoshi Kaku 1 / 1 (100%)
Director of the Board,
President and CEO		 Hiroyuki Isono 1 / 1 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Michihiro Nara 1 / 1 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Sachiko Ai 1 / 1 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Seiko Nagai 1 / 1 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Hiromichi Ogawa
(Appointed June 2022)		 1 / 1 (100%)

4. Structure and attendance of Compensation Committee

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Compensation Committee Meeting in FY 2022
Director, Chairman of the Board Masatoshi Kaku 2 / 2 (100%)
Director of the Board,
President and CEO		 Hiroyuki Isono 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Michihiro Nara 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Sachiko Ai 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Seiko Nagai 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Hiromichi Ogawa
(Appointed June 2022)		 1 / 1 (100%)

5. Structure of Audit & Supervisory Board

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Breakdown As of June 2023
Number of Audit & Supervisory Board members 5
Number of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board members 3
Number of Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board members 3

6. Status of attendance at the Audit & Supervisory Board Meeting

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Audit & Supervisory Board Meeting in FY 2022
Audit & Supervisory Board member Tomihiro Yamashita 13 / 13 (100%)
Audit & Supervisory Board member Nobuko Otsuka 13 / 13 (100%)
Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board member Mikinao Kitada 4 / 4 (100%)
Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board member Hiderou Chimori 13 / 13 (100%)
Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board member Noriko Sekiguchi 13 / 13 (100%)
Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board member Takashi Nonoue
(Appointed June 2022)		 9 / 9 (100%)

7. Total amount of remuneration, etc. for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(FY2022)

Position No. of Personnel Total remuneration (million yen) Fixed remuneration (million yen) Performance-linked remuneration (million yen)
Bonuses Stock-based remuneration
Director 16 519 266 136 117
(Independent Outside Director) (5) (60) (60) (-) (-)
Audit & Supervisory Board Member 6 94 94 - -
(Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member) (4) (39) (39) (-) (-)
Total 22 614 361 136 117
  • *Note:Numbers less than one million yen are rounded down to the nearest million.

8. Remuneration of the Company's Accounting Auditors

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: million yen)

Segment FY2022
Remuneration of the Company's Accounting Auditors 164
The amount required to be paid to Accounting Auditors by the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries
Total amount of other property benefits		 343

9. Political contribution amount

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2022
Political contribution amount (1,000 yen) 1,648

10. Shares of the Company

11. Major shareholders top10

12. Anti-corruption

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2022
Number of staff dismissed due to non-compliance with anti-corruption policies 0
Cost of fines, penalties or settlements in relation to corruption (yen) 0
Provisions for fines and settlements in relation to corruption (yen) 0

13. Number of whistleblowing cases received

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Number of whistleblowing cases 131 114 140 138 133