Logo

ESG Data

ESG Data

  • Environment
  • Social
  • Governance

Environment

  • Data aggregation was performed in accordance with the Environment Accounting Guideline published by Japan's Ministry of the Environment
  • Companies covered: Unless otherwise noted in the footnotes or tables, business sites of consolidated companies are included in the data, but non-production sites (primarily the main building, sales offices, and other sites that perform managerial and administrative work and sites where GHG and environment impact are extremely low) are excluded.
  • Period : Apr 1 2020 to Mar 31 2021

1. Environment Conservation Cost1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: Million yen)

Category Main initiatives FY2020
Investment Cost
1 Environment conservation costs for curbing environment impact generated by production and service activities within business sites 3,888 17,036
Breakdown ⅰ Environment conservation management costs Measures against air pollution, water pollution, noise and vibration, etc. 1,164 10,098
ⅱ Global environment conservation costs Cultivating company-owned forests in Japan, forest plantation operations outside Japan, energy conservation investments 1,576 681
ⅲ Resource circulation costs Efficient utilization of resources, costs for waste measures 1,148 6,257
2 Costs for curbing environment impact generated upstream or downstream by production and service activities Costs for purchasing low-sulfur fuel (balance amount) 0 403
3 Environment conservation cost related to administrative activities Employee education, ISO 14001 costs, costs for air and water analysis, costs for operating committees and other organizations, etc. 0 915
4 Environment conservation costs related to R&D activities Product development that contributes to environment conservation by promoting utilization of recovered paper, curbing environment impact that occurs during production, etc. 477 2,679
5 Environment conservation costs related to social activities Philanthropic programs, support for various environment groups, environment and sustainability reporting, Eco-Products exhibit, etc. 0 81
6 Costs related to environment damage Pollution impact levy (SOx) 0 511
Total 4,365 21,624
  • 1)Companies covered: Companies in Japan of Oji Holdings, Oji Paper, Oji Materia, Oji F-Tex, Oji Imaging Media, Oji Nepia, Oji Cornstarch, Oji Tac, Oji Container, Morishigyo, Oji Green Resources, Oji Forest & Products

2. Economic benefit associated with environment conservation activities1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: Million yen)

Effect FY2019 FY2020
Income from company-owned forests in Japan 411 415
Reduced expenses from energy saved 1,977 1,840
Income from recycling 3,542 3,439
Total 5,930 5,694
  • 1)Companies covered: Companies in Japan of Oji Holdings, Oji Paper, Oji Materia, Oji F-Tex, Oji Imaging Media, Oji Nepia, Oji Cornstarch, Oji Tac, Oji Container, Morishigyo, Oji Green Resources, Oji Forest & Products

3. Greenhouse Gas (GHG)1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Greenhouse Gas Emissions related to manufacturing (kiloton-CO2e) 2) 7,611 7,667 7,606 7,334 7,086
GHG Production intensity (t-CO2e/production ton) 0.485 0.481 0.476 0.473 0.495
Percentage reduction from base year 2013 (%) 7.3% 8.0% 9.0% 9.6% 5.4%
Percentage reduction targeted (%) 5.0% 7.9% 8.7% 9.4% 10.0%
Scope 1 (Direct emissions) Emission (kiloton-CO2e) 6,587 6,595 6,394 6,323 6,267★
Intensity (t-CO2e/ Sales million yen) 4.575 4.439 4.123 4.194 4.611
Scope 2 (Indirect emissions) Emission (kiloton-CO2e) 1,305 1,349 1,442 1,327 1,193★
Intensity (t-CO2e/ Sales million yen) 0.906 0.899 0.930 0.880 0.878
Scope 1+2 Emission (kiloton-CO2e) 7,892 7,944 7,836 7,650 7,460★
Intensity (t-CO2e/ Sales million yen) 5.481 5.347 5.052 5.074 5.489
Scope 1 breakdown by GHG type (kiloton CO2e) CO2 6,850 6,932 6,832 6,623 6,413
CH4 157 153 148 149 149
N2O 885 859 856 878 898
HFC N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
PFC N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
SF6 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
NF3 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
Total 7,892 7,944 7,836 7,650 7,460
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2020 figures have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)Calculation of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
    • GHG emissions in Japan are calculated based on Act on Rationalizing Energy Use (Energy Conservation Act), Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (Global Warming Act), and base emissions factors of individual electric power companies.
    • GHG emissions overseas are based on IPCC 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories and IEA CO2 emission factors by country in 2010.
    • Emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) generated in conjunction with the use of fossil fuels do not include emissions relating to the supply of electric power or heat to other companies.
    • Emissions from fuels derived from biomass (black liquor, wood, etc.) that are subject to the Global Warming Act are calculated.
    • Since unit calorific values for non-fossil fuels emphasize comparability to reduction targets, the factors set in the FY2013 reporting are used.
  • 2)Calculation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions related to manufacturing
    Emissions from the electric power business and transportation of products by company vehicles are not included

4. Scope 3 (FY2020)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Category and Coverage Emission (kiloton-CO2e) Ratio (%) Scope
Domestic Overseas Total
1 Purchased goods and services;
- Emission from activities in producing raw materials,
parts, purchased goods and sales materials		 2,158 1,272 3,430★ 69.7% Consolidated companies
2 Capital goods;
- Emission from building and producing capital goods of our companies		 121 216 337 6.8% Consolidated companies
3 Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2);
- Emission from purchasing fuel, electricity,
heats and generating electricity		 341 277 618 12.6% Consolidated companies
4 Upstream transportation and distribution;
- Emission from transportation and distribution of raw materials,
parts, purchased goods and sales materials to our companies		 223 140 363 7.4% Consolidated companies
5 Waste generated in operations;
- Emission from transportation and disposal of waste generated in our companies		 19 12 31 0.6% Consolidated companies
6 Business travel;
- Emission from business travel of employees		 2 3 5 0.1% Consolidated companies
7 Employee commuting;
- Emission from employees commuting		 7 11 18 0.4% Consolidated companies
8 Upstream leased assets1);
- Emission from operation of leased assets that our companies leased
(not included in Scope 1 or 2)		 0 0 0 0.0% Consolidated companies
9 Downstream transportation and distribution2);
- Emission from operating leased assets that our companies leased		 0 0 0 0.0% Consolidated companies
10 Processing of sold products;
- Emission from processing of intermediate products by business operators		 122 0 122 2.5% Consolidated companies
11 Use of sold products3);
- Emission from use of products by users (consumers, business operators)		 0 0 0 0.0%  
12 End of life treatment of sold products4);
- Emission from transportation and disposal of products when disposing by users
(consumers, business operators)		 0 0 0 0.0%  
13 Downstream leased assets;
- Emission from operating leased assets that our companies leased		 ＜0.1 0 ＜0.1 0.0%  
14 Franchises5);
- Emission by franchises		 0 0 0 0.0%  
15 Investments6);
- Emission related with investments management.		 0 0 0 0.0%  
Total 2,993 1,931 4,924    
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2020 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)Calculated in Scope1, 2
  • 2)Category 4 Includes transport, delivery (upstream).
  • 3)Since the Group's main sales products, paper products, do not use energy during use, the Group considers that GHG emissions during product use are zero.
  • 4)The Group's main sales products are paper products, which emit CO2 when discarded. However, the Group's raw materials absorb CO2 when grown, so the Group's emissions are offset and considered to be zero.
  • 5)Since the Group is not the president of the franchise, the emissions sources falling under this category are considered to be zero.
  • 6)Since the Group is not an investment or financial institution, zero emissions sources are considered to fall under this category.

5. Energy consumption 1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Segment FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Fuel type of using
(Electric power equivalent GWh)		 Oil 4,172 4,397 3,888 3,542 3,537
Coal 8,456 8,388 8,164 7,632 7,533
Gas 4,087 4,202 4,096 4,095 3,982
Purchased energy 3,868 3,920 4,160 3,852 3,603
Biomass, sludge,etc 32,583 33,037 33,076 33,024 30,130
Waste 7,136 7,328 7,195 7,273 7,284
Hydro 326 324 397 375 360
Solar 5 5 5 5 5
Sub total 60,633 61,601 60,982 59,797 56,434
Total energy consumption
(Crude Oil equivalent)		 Consumption
(Million liter)		 5,789 5,874 5,822 5,660 5,219★
Intensity
(kilo-liter/production ton)		 0.369 0.369 0.364 0.365 0.365
Production capacity by energy type
(MW)		 Thermal power 2) 1,622 1,622 1,697 1,697
Hydro power 72 72 72 72
Solar power 4 4 4 4
Real power generation by energy type
(GWh/ yr.) 3)		 Thermal power 7,899 7,695 7,969 7,864
Hydro power 324 397 350 360
Solar power 5 5 5 5
Real power consumption
(GWh /yr.)		 Total power consumption 11,121 11,100 11,091 10,757
Renewable energy power in total power consumption 4,390 4,451 4,611 4,338
Purchased power from renewable energy4) 0 0 0 0
Biomass power generation companies
Power generation capacity by type
(MW)		 Biomass power generation 51 51 126 126
Energy input
(electric power equivalent GWh)		 Coal 10 1.0 32.2 37.1
Oil 0.3 0.3 1.0 1.2
Biomass 402.2 414.3 667.7 968.6
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2020 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)Energy conversion
    • Unit calorific values are calculated by using the following laws and international standards.
      [Japan]: Act on Rationalizing Energy Use (Energy Conservation Act) and Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (Global Warming Act).
      The energy conversion of electric power from in-house hydropower generation uses 3.6 GJ per 1,000 kWh.
      [Overseas]: IPCC 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
    • Consumption relating to the electric power business (supply of electricity or heat to other companies) and transport by Group-owned vehicles is excluded.
    • Energy relating to the supply of electric power or heat to other companies is excluded from fossil fuel and non-fossil fuel derived energy.
    • Since unit calorific values for non-fossil fuels emphasize comparability to reduction targets, the factors set in the FY2013 reporting are used.
  • 2)Thermal Power Generation by the Group
    • Thermal power generation includes power generation capacity of spare facilities. Thermal power generation refers to the sum of Oil and Coal, Biomass, Wastes burning alone and mixed burning.
  • 3)Performance of the Group's Power Generation
    • The total amount of electricity consumed and sold in-house is shown in the figure.
  • 4)Enter the amount of purchased electricity that can be proved to be derived from renewable energy, such as the Green Power Certification.

6. Acquisition status of environment management system (EMS)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment As of March 31, 2020 As of March 31, 2021
Number of sites covered by ISO14001 137 137
Percentage of sites covered by ISO14001 (%) 100 100
  • Note: In Oji Group, 137 worksites are promoting to obtain ISO 14001 and all of them have obtained ISO 14001 certification as of March 31 2020.

7. Environmental fines and penalties

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2019 FY2020
Environmental fines and penalties (yen) 0 (No occurrence) 0 (No occurrence)
  • Note:Violation of environmental laws and regulations such as water intake, drainage, air, waste, etc.

8. Environmental burden substances (BOD, COD, and SS) in wastewater and drainage amount

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
[Target] Improve emission intensity of pollution materials more than 1% compared with the previous year
Segment FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
BOD emission (ton) 8,504 7,913 7,860 7,740 7,567
Emission intensity (kg/ production ton) 0.54 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.53
(kg/million yen) 5.91 5.33 5.07 5.13 5.57
Year-on-year improvement rate evaluation (Target) × ○ ○
-4.9%		 ×
FY2019 target:5.02 or less		 ×
FY2020 target:5.08 or less
COD emission (ton) 34,719 35,215 34,932 35,038 32,897
Emission intensity (kg/ production ton) 2.21 2.21 2.19 2.26 2.30
(kg/million yen) 24.11 23.70 22.52 23.24 24.21
Year-on-year improvement rate evaluation (Target) × ○ ○
-5.0%		 ×
FY2019 target: 22.29 or less		 ×
FY2020 target: 23.01 or less
SS emission (ton) 14,643 14,943 14,829 14,436 13,094
Emission intensity (kg/ production ton) 0.93 0.94 0.93 0.93 0.91
(kg/million yen) 10.17 10.06 9.56 9.58 9.63
Year-on-year, improvement rate evaluation (Target) ○ ○ ○
-5.0%		 ×
FY2019 target: 9.46 or less		 ×
FY2020 target: 9.48 or less
Total wastewater (thousand m3) 715,798 716,792 708,494 701,024 671,965★
Wastewater destination River and lake 285,278 285,470 280,690 277,848 272,227
Sea 357,688 358,113 354,651 354,108 339,423
Groundwater 2 2 2 2 10
Sewer 72,830 73,206 73,150 69,065 60,305
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2020 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • Note:BOD(Biochemical oxygen demand), COD(Chemical oxygen demand), SS(Suspended solids)
    Companies covered;all consolidated companies that be regulated with wastewater.

9. Amount of environment burden substances in emitted gas

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
  [Target] Improve intensity of SOX emission more than 1% compared with the previous year
SOx emission (ton) 7,107 6,435 6,394 5,704 5,529
Emission intensity (kg/production ton) 0.45 0.40 0.40 0.37 0.39
(kg/million yen) 4.94 4.33 4.12 3.78 4.07
Year on year improvement rate achievement (Target) × ○ ○ ○
-8.3%		 ×
FY2020 target: 3.75 or less
NOx emission (ton) 11,093 11,206 10,834 10,750 10,118
Emission intensity (kg/production ton) 0.71 0.70 0.68 0.69 0.71
(kg/million yen) 7.70 7.54 6.99 7.13 7.44
Dust emission (ton) 2,893 3,135 2,944 3,097 3,148
Emission intensity (kg/production ton) 0.18 0.20 0.18 0.20 0.22
(kg/million yen) 2.01 2.11 1.90 2.05 2.32
  [Target] Reduce VOC emissions per unit of production to less than the 2010 unit (0.61).
VOC emission (ton) 594 622 523 481 227★
Emission intensity (kg/production ton) 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02
(kg/million yen) 0.41 0.42 0.34 0.32 0.17
Year on year improvement rate achievement (Target) ○ ○ ○ ○
-47%		 ○
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2020 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • Note:Environmentally hazardous substance content in the emitted gas
    • Data of SOx, NOx and Dust cover all consolidated companies that be regulated.
    • VOC Emission data cover all consolidated companies that submit the notifications of PRTR

10. Waste and PRTR Chemical Substances

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Industrial waste generation1) Domestic (AD kiloton) 1,484 1,494 1,517 1,458 1,347
Overseas (AD kiloton) 1,279 1,288 1,358 1,299 1,386
Total (AD kiloton) 2,762 2,782 2,875 2,757 2,733★
Generation intensity (AD kg/production ton) 176.0 174.7 180.0 177.8 191.0
(AD kg/million yen) 1,919 1,872 1,854 1,829 2,011
Efficient use amount (AD kiloton) 2,618 2,617 2,708 2,586 2,570
Landfill amount (Final disposal amount) Domestic (AD kiloton) 32 25 25 23 17
Overseas (AD kiloton) 112 140 141 149 146
Total (AD kiloton) 144 165 166 172 163
Landfill intensity (AD kg/production ton) 9.2 10.4 10.4 11.1 11.4
(AD kg/million yen) 100 111 107 114 120
Efficient use ratio   [Target] Domestic 99% or more, Overseas 95% or more by FY2020
Domestic (%) 97.9 98.3 98.3 98.4 98.8
Overseas (%) 91.2 89.1 89.6 88.5 89.4
Hazardous waste generation amount (AD ton) 25,115 23,252 14,059 8,723 11,832
Generation intensity (AD kg/production ton) 1.60 1.46 0.88 0.56 0.83
(AD kg/million yen) 17.4 15.6 9.06 5.79 8.71
PRTR Chemical substance released amount and transferred amount2) (ton) 842 826 787 750 440
Released and transferred intensity (kg/production ton) 85.2 82.2 77.7 76.8 49.1
(kg/million yen) 0.59 0.56 0.51 0.50 0.32
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2020 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • 1)The amount of industrial waste generated includes the amount of valuable resources.
  • 2)PRTR data cover all consolidated companies that submit the notifications of PRTR

11. Amounts of Substances Subject to the PRTR Law Released and Transferred (FY 2020)

Scope of data calculation below are consolidated basis. If different, we added notices.

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Chemical Substance (unit) Handled amount including generated amount Amount Released Amount Transferred Total Amount
Zinc compounds (water-soluble) (ton) 8.6 0.2 0.4 0.6
Acrylic acid and its water-soluble salt (ton) 3.0 - 0.002 0.002
n-Butyl Acrylate (ton) 4.8 0.3 0.1 0.4
Methyl acrylate (ton) 1.1 0.1 0.02 0.1
2-Aminoethanol (ton) 11.9 0.005 0.1 0.1
Asbestos (ton) 5.9 - 5.9 5.9
Isoprene (ton) 9.4 0.1 - 0.1
Ethylbenzene (ton) 1.6 0.02 0.1 0.1
Ethylene oxide (ton) 2.0 0.01 - 0.01
Ferric chloride (ton) 115.7 - - -
Xylene (ton) 21.5 0.2 0.4 0.6
Chromium and trivalent chromium compounds (ton) 24.5 0.002 0.01 0.01
Chloroform (ton) 14.8 14.7 - 14.7
Vinyl acetate (ton) 338.3 0.7 0.6 1.3
Cyclohexylamine (ton) 2.5 2.1 - 2.1
2,2-Dibromo-2-cyanoacetamide (ton) 51.8 25.2 0.2 25.4
Styrene (ton) 227.6 - 0.2 0.2
Dioxins (mg-TEQ) 676.7 284.9 391.8 676.7
Decanoic acid (ton) 1.4 - - -
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (ton) 5.3 3.7 - 3.7
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (ton) 15.7 0.05 0.02 0.07
Toluene (ton) 1,906.8 184.9 143.9 328.8
Hexamethylene diacrylate (ton) 4.0 - - -
Nickel (ton) 15.9 0.005 0.003 0.01
Oxin copper(ton) 1.7 0.4 0.1 0.5
Methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate (ton) 1.0 0.07 0.1 0.2
Phenol (ton) 3.9 0.01 0.2 0.2
n-Hexane (ton) 11.2 0.1 0.1 0.2
Benzene (ton) 24.4 23.3 - 23.3
Boron compounds (ton) 217.0 17.8 1.0 18.8
Poly (oxyethylene) alkyl ether (alkyl C=12-15) (ton) 2.4 1.4 0.1 1.5
Sodium poly (oxyethylene) dodecyl ether sulfate (ton) 6.9 4.9 - 4.9
Formaldehyde (ton) 1.0 0.8 0.01 0.8
Manganese and its compounds (ton) 5.1 4.1 - 4.1
Methylnaphthalene (ton) 282.2 1.4 - 1.4
Methylenebis (4.1-phenylene) = diisocyanate (ton) 1.4 - - -
Total 3,352 287 153 440
  • The Data covers all consolidated companies that submit the notifications of PRTR.
  • Excluding dioxins, numbers prepared for substances of which one ton or more (0.5 tons or more Specified Class 1 Designated Chemical Substances) is handled ( including amount produced).

12. Usage of main raw materials

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Main raw materials FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Woodchip and lumber (kilo ton) 13,089 13,337 13,432 13,171 11,940
Recovered paper (kilo ton) 4,329 4,367 4,343 4,339 4,374
Pulp (kilo ton) 325 358 341 328 312
Purchased containerboard and corrugated sheet (kilo ton) 2,994 3,069 3,309 3,262 3,212
Total (kilo ton) 20,738 21,130 21,425 21,100 19,838
  • Note:Amount includes intra-group transaction

13. Water Resource

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
  [Target] Improve intensity of water intake 1% or more compared with the previous year
Water intake (thousand m3) 743,268 744,056 740,398 736,684 706,298★
Water intensity (m3/ production ton) 47.3 46.7 46.4 47.5 49.3
(m3/ million yen) 516.2 500.7 477.4 488.6 519.7
Year on year improvement rate achievement (Target) ○ ○ ○ × ×
Breakdown of water intake
(thousand m3)		 Surface water
(river, lake, sea, brackish water)		 487,073 486,786 487,936 483,096 476,998
Groundwater
(well water, subsoil water)		 150,226 150,090 151,295 147,125 127,843
Third party organization
(water supply, city water)		 105,969 107,179 101,168 106,463 101,457
Recycled water amount (thousand m3) 715,927 703,028 694,746 687,411 654,924
Recycled ratio (%) 96% 94% 94% 93% 93%
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2020 figure has been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.

Changes in water consumption

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Water intake (thousand m3) 743,268 744,056 740,398 736,684 706,298
Wastewater (thousand m3) 715,798 716,792 708,494 701,024 671,965
Water consumption (thousand m3) 27,470 27,264 31,907 35,659 34,333
Water consumption intensity (m3/ million yen) 19.08 18.35 20.57 23.65 25.26

14. Water intensity in Electric Power Business1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Gross generation (MWh) 410,896 412,587 415,631 700,887 1,006,844
Water intake (m3) 1,516,012 1,560,392 1,537,505 2,090,868 2,662,414
Water intensity (m3/MWh) 3.69 3.78 3.70 2.98 2.64
  • 1) Electric power companies (Oji Green Energy Nichinan Co. Ltd., Oji Green Energy Ebetsu Co. Ltd., MPM Oji Eco Energy Co., Ltd.)

15. Recovered paper use1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Recovered paper used amount (kilo ton) 4,066 4,093 4,081 4,010 3,826
Recovered paper utilization ratio (%) 63.5 64.0 64.0 65.6 68.5
Achievement rate2) (%) 97.7 98.5 98.5 100.9 105.4
  • 1)Companies covered: Companies in Japan of Oji Paper, Oji Materia, Oji F-Tex, Oji Nepia
  • 2)Target for recovered paper utilization ratio: 65% from FY2016 to FY2020, 70% or above from FY2021 to FY2030

16. Environment-related data by segment

Domestic and overseas environmental burden data (FY 2020)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  Operating
sites		 Production
(kilo ton)		 GHG Water
resource		 Industrial
waste		 Domestic
chemical
substances		 Environmental
burden
in wastewater		 Environmental
burden
in emission gas
Emission (CO2e)
(Thousand ton)		 Intensity
(tCO2e/production ton)		 Water intake
(Thousand m3)		 Intensity
(m3/ production ton)		 Final disposal amount
(Appearance ton)		 Intensity
(kg/ production ton)		 PRTR chemical substances
(Released and transferred amount ton)		 Intensity
(g/ production ton)		 BOD
(ton)		 COD
(ton)		 SS
(ton)		 SOx (SO2 conversion)
(ton)		 NOx (NO2 conversion)
(ton)		 Soot and Dust
(ton)
Industrial Material Business 167 6,450 3,010 0.467 198,973 30.8 17,041 2.6 131 25 3,827 3,613 2,413 1,822 2,802 166
Household and Consumer Product Business 8 196 37 0.190 4,009 20.4 82 0.4 (*1) (*1) (*1) 213 47 <1 5 1
Functional Materials Business 26 635 571 0.900 51,050 80.4 3,887 6.1 260 739 782 126 652 664 444 70
Forest Resources and Environment Marketing Business 34 3,120 548 0.176 64,553 20.7 43,086 13.8 <1 0 1,435 12,565 391 210 607 1,736
Printing and Communications Media Business 7 2,783 2,757 0.991 338,697 121.7 9,714 3.5 48 21 631 16,369 7,954 2,833 5,566 288
Other business 49 1,129 451 0.400 49,016 43.4 89,116 79.0 0 4 892 11 1,636 0 694 889
Total (consolidated companies) 291 14,313 7,374 0.515 706,298 49.3 162,925 11.4 440 49 7,567 32,897 13,094 5,529 10,118 3,148
  • Production volume includes the volume of transactions within the group.
  • Greenhouse gas emissions are calculated under the following conditions.
    1. Emission factors in the following laws and international standards are used.
      [Japan]: Act on Rationalizing Energy Use (Energy Conservation Act), Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (Global Warming Act), and base emissions factors of individual electric power companies.
      [Overseas]: IPCC 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories and IEA CO2 emission factors by country in 2010.
    2. Emissions relating to transport of products, etc. by Group-owned vehicles are not included.
    3. Emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) generated in conjunction with the use of fossil fuels do not include emissions relating to the supply of electric power or heat to other companies.
    4. Emissions from fuels derived from biomass (black liquor, wood, etc.) that are subject to the Global Warming Act are calculated.
    5. Since unit calorific values for non-fossil fuels emphasize comparability to reduction targets, the factors set in the FY2013 reporting are used.
  • The environmental impact (BOD, COD, SS) of water emissions and the environmental impact (SOx, NOx, soot and dust) of air emissions are the amounts of emissions from business sites to which regulations are applied.

Note: (*1) Emissions not listed because there are no sites where regulations are applied.

17. Changes of forest certification acquisition rate

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Overseas Forest Plantations (Production forest) Area (ha) 228,133 202,646 236,610 237,353 231,715
Forest certification acquisition (%) 84% 89% 92% 94% 91%
Company-owned Forests in Japan (Production forest) Area (ha) 172,641 172,641 172,641 172,641 172,635
Forest certification acquisition (%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  • Production forest:A forest whose main purpose is to produce timber while considering environmental protection.

18. Forest plantation business

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

As of March 2021

Plantation company Year established Planted area (ha) Remarks
(Area and country) Forest certification code
Southland Plantation Forest Co. of New Zealand Ltd. 1992 9,385 https://www.spfl.co.nz/
(SPFL) (South Island, New Zealand) NC-FM/COC-001130
FM：FM107252/CoC：CoC107252
Albany Planation Forest Co. of Australia Pty Ltd. 1993 6,570 http://albanyplantations.com.au/apfl.aspx
(APFL) (Western Australia, Australia) SA-CW/FM-006020
Quy Nhon Plantation Forest Co. of Vietnam Ltd. 1995 8,515  
(QPFL) (Bin Dinh pro, Vietnam) SGS-FM/COC-002539
Green Triangle Plantation Forest Co. of Australia Pty. Ltd. 1997 2,859  
(GPFL) (Victoria, Australia)  
Huizhou Nanyou Forest Development Co., Ltd. 2002 3,798  
(KPFL) (Huizhou, China)  
PT Korintiga Hutani 1998 39,071 https://kth.co.id/
(KTH) (Kalimantan, Indonesia) SGS-CW/FM-009866
AJA/IFCC-PEFC/FMC-HT/00038/1/2018
Truong Thanh Oji Plantation Forest Company Limited 2011 2,286  
(TTO) (Phu Yen, Vietnam) SGS-FM/COC-011627
Celulose Nipo-Brasileira S.A 1973 143,859 http://www.cenibra.com.br/
(CENIBRA) (Minas Gerais, Brazil) IMA-FM/COC-007629
IMA-COC-007630/IMA-CW-007630
Pan Pac Forest Products Ltd 1971 35,329 https://www.panpac.co.nz/
(PAN PAC) (North island, New Zealand) SGS-FM/COC-000850
BR021517-1
Oji Fibre Solutions 2014 6,010 https://www.ojifs.com/
(OjiFS) (North island, New Zealand)  
Total (ha) 257,682  

19. Procurement volume of wood chips and market pulp for Oji Group in FY 2020

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Origin Wood chip Raw material composition Origin Market pulp Raw material composition
(k BDT) (%) (k ADT) (%)
Japan 775.1 21% Sawmill residue Brazil 64.6 48% Planted tree
Vietnam 737.3 20% Planted tree New Zealand 35.4 27% Planted tree,
Sawmil residue
Thai 697.5 19% Planted tree Canada 18.0 13% Regrowt forest
Indonesia 364.1 10% Planted tree Japan 8.5 6% Sawmill residue
Australia 358.5 10% Planted tree Sweden 3.8 3% Regrowt forest
U.S.A. 243.7 7% Sawmill residue U.S.A 2.6 2% Planted tree,
Sawmil residue
Chili 189.7 5% Planted tree Finland 0.4 0% Regrowt forest
New Zealand 109.0 3% Planted tree Chili 0.2 0% Planted tree
Malaysia 98.3 3% Planted tree Total 133.5 100%  
Fiji 88.6 2% Planted tree
South Africa 0.0 0% Planted tree
Total 3,661.8 100%  
  • We have confirmed that the wood chips and the market pulp are wood raw materials that meet FSC™ certifiied materials and FSC™ requirements.

20. Changes in CO2 absorption and fixed amount by production forest and environmental conservation forest

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Average
Actual carbon stock1) (kiloton-CO2) 128,153 128,323 129,219 -
Net increment in carbon stock2)(kiloton/yr.-CO2) 2,552 1,389 935 1,625
Forest area in the scope of calucutation3)(1,000 ha) 510 511 514 -
  • 1)Actual carbon stocks , ton-CO2 [Stock change method]
  • 　(Production forest) = Actual merchantable volume at the end of FY2020 x Biomass expansion coefficient x (1+underground / above-ground ratio) x Wood density x Carbon ratio x CO2 conversion coefficient.
  • 　(Environmental conservation forest) = Remaining area at the end of FY2020 x above-ground biomass of natural forest x (1+underground / above-ground ratio) x carbon ratio x CO2 conversion coefficient.
  • 2)Net increment in carbon stocks, ton/yr.-CO2 [Gain-Loss Method]
    (Production forest) : CO2 absorption by growth - CO2 emission by felling
  • 　(Environmental conservation forest) = Remaining area at the end of FY2020 x Annual growth rate of above-ground biomass x (1+underground / above-ground ratio) x carbon ratio x CO2 conversion coefficient.
  • 3) Forest area in the scope of calculation for CO2 absorption and fixation covers all consolidated companies in line with GHG emissions.

21. Changes in net GHG emissions

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2018
(Base year)		 FY2019 FY2020 Average
GHG emissions (cope 1+2)
(kiloton/yr.-CO2e)		 7,836 7,650 7,460 7,649
Net increment in carbon stock
(kiloton/yr.-CO2)		 2,552 1,389 935 1,625
Net GHG emissions
(kiloton/yr.-CO2e)		 5,284 6,261 6,525 6,023
GHG reduction rate - -20% -17% -23%

22. Environmental conservation activities

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Group company Country/ Area Program
1. Oji Forest & Products Hokkaido, Japan Sarufutsu Itou Conservation Activities
2. Oji Forest & Products Hokkaido, Japan Conservation activities for endangered alpine plants
3. Oji Forest & Products Yamanashi, Japan Lily-of-the-Valley Habitat Conservation
4. Oji Forest & Products Kochi, Japan Measures to Protect the Fairy Pitta (Koyagauchi company-owned forest in Kochi Prefecture)
5. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Mutumu Project
6. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Initiatives for preserving biodiversity
7. Pan Pac New Zealand Conservation activity for Kiwi
8. Oji Holdings Tokyo, Japan Forest Picture Book Contest and Environmental Class
9. SPFL New Zealand Rare, Threatened and Endangered (RTE) species

Social

1. Employee

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Scope As of Mar 31, 2018 As of Mar 31, 2019 As of Mar 31, 2020 As of Mar 31, 2021
Number of permanent employees Consolidated 17,082 36,309 36,810 36,034
Number of temporary employees Consolidated 2,446 2,705 2,507 2,335
Men and women rates (%) Consolidated (Male) 84.29 80.99 81.45 81.39
Consolidated (Female) 15.71 19.01 18.55 18.61
Permanent employees voluntary turnover rates (%) Oji HD 1.06 4.21 3.48 4.61
Oji MO 8.85 2.20 3.85 1.47
  • Oji HD; Oji Holdings, Oji MO; Oji Management office

2. Female managers rates

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Female managers rates (%) 2.5 2.9 3.1 3.5 3.6
  • For 16 group companies

3. Female hiring rates in comprehensive work

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Female hiring rates in comprehensive work (%) 43 44 34 33 29
  • For 16 group companies

4. Annual total working hours (hours / person-year)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Annual total working hours
(hours / person-year)		 1,861 1,839 1,825 1,827 1,819
  • Oji Group Tokyo Headquarters Area (28 companies / departments)

5. Human rights violations (cases)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Scope FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Number of human rights violations (cases) Consolidated 6 4 4
  • For group companies in Japan

6. Number of worksites acquired OHSAS18001 certification

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Scope Domestic and overseas As of October 2019*1 As of May 2020*2 As of May 2021*3
Number of worksites acquired OHSAS18001 certification / Number of all worksites Consolidated Domestic 0 (239) 0 (240) 0 (240)
Overseas 9 (70) 3 (69) 0 (71)
  • *Note:At the same time as renew the OHSAS 18001 certification, it does not include the worksites that have acquired ISO 45001 certification. (*1;2 sites, *2;4 sites, *3;8 sites).
  • Currently, 10 worksites of the Oji Group have acquired ISO 45001 certification.

7. Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate and severity rate for safety

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Scope FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
LTIFR1) Oji Group Consolidated 1.07 1.02 0.89 0.88 0.80★
Domestic 0.61 0.79 0.76 0.67 0.74★
Overseas 1.56 1.25 1.01 1.08 0.85★
Manufacturing3) 1.15 1.02 1.20 1.20 1.21
Pulp, paper and paper product manufacturing3) 1.31 1.46 1.88 1.94 1.54
Severity rate2) Oji Group Consolidated 0.22 0.22 0.02 0.12 0.12
Domestic 0.22 0.22 0.03 0.22 0.23
Overseas 0.22 0.21 0.01 0.02 0.01
Manufacturing3) 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.07
Pulp, paper and paper product manufacturing3) 0.04 0.24 0.22 0.63 0.39
  • ★A star mark indicates that FY2020 figures have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
  • Period:January 1 to December 31
  • 1)LTIFR:
    • LTIFR = (the number of lost time injuries ÷ total working hours) × 1,000,000
      Lost time injuries (LTI) is defined as an occurrence that resulted in a fatality, permanent disability or time lost from work of one day/shift or more.
    • Total working hours are calculated based on the number of group company employees (regular employees and temporary / non-regular employees) as of the end of September every year, assuming the annual working hours per person is 2,000 hours.
  • 2)Severity rate:
    • Number of workday lost / total work hours x 1,000 (Fatalities and severe incidents =7,500 days, temporary work lost = lost calendar days x 300/365)
  • 3)Manufacturing, Pulp, paper and paper product manufacturing:
    • The data is quoted from an occupational accident survey (investigator: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, target worksites: 100 or more employees).

8. Lost time incidents and fatalities

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Scope FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Number of work related lost time incidents1) Oji Group Consolidated 80 77 69 68 61
Domestic (Permanent employees) 20 25 24 21 25
Domestic (Non permanent employees) 3 5 6 4 2
Overseas (Permanent employees) 53 46 38 43 34
Overseas (Non permanent employees) 4 1 1 0 0
Contractors2) Consolidated 8 10 20 10 9
Domestic 8 10 20 10 9
Overseas - - - - -
Number of work related fatalities Oji Group Consolidated 2 2 0 1 1
Domestic (Permanent employees) 1 1 0 1 1
Domestic (Non permanent employees) 0 0 0 0 0
Overseas (Permanent employees) 1 1 0 0 0
Overseas (Non permanent employees) 0 0 0 0 0
Contractors2) Consolidated 1 0 1 0 0
Domestic 1 0 1 0 0
Overseas 0 0 0 0 0
Occasional entering Contractors3) 0 2 2 1 2
Domestic 0 1 1 0 1
Overseas 0 1 1 1 1
  • Period: January 1 to December 31
  • Target: consolidated companies,contractors,occasional entering contractors
  • 1)Work related lost time incident :If 2 persons injured at one time,it counts 2.
  • 2)Contractors: affiliates being resident on the Group’s premises(non-consolidate companies in Oji Group and non-Oji Group companies)
  • 3)Occasional entering contractors: Business operators who enter the Group’s premises on a temporary basis.

9. Oji Group health and safety education records (in Japan)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Safety and Health Education programs FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
1. General Safety and Health Managers Seminar, Safety and Health Seminar for Top management 18 10 8
2. Education at the Time of appointment of a Safety Officer (including complementary education) 136 155 98
3. Health Officer education (including complementary education) 6 20 13
4. Safety and Health Promoter education (for worksites less than 50 workers) 10 24 14
5. Foremen, etc. education/Safety and Health Controller education (including Capacity development) 1,069 371 206
6. Education at the time of employment (for new employees) 1,165 1,031 655
7. Education for relocated and transferred employees 352 271 422
8. Skill training course (Operations Chief or training for restricted employment) 1,629 1,137 776
9. Special education (Education for safety and health to those who are currently engaged in dangerous or harmful work) 736 2,289 1,063
10. Risk assessment training 280 264 217
11. OSHMS (Occupational Safety and Health Management System) related education/training 76 33 27
12. Machine safety education 291 84 39
13. Chemical Management education - 307 229
14. Work-related      
  Safety and Health education for workers in charge of dangerous or harmful work (except for Special Education) 240 225 213
Safety education on heavy machines including forklifts 3,917 4,222 2,327
Danger and safety sensory education (Including education with virtual reality devices) 2,920 2,013 14,172
Health and safety education on dangerous chemicals/powder substances (powder dust) 1,278 280 590
Safety education on electricity/education for workers responsible for power control 1,220 1,033 1,050
Health and safety education on ionizing radiation 995 353 320
Others 195 469 395
15. For each rank      
  Health and safety education 1- 5 years after joining the company 87 842 894
Health and safety education for junior workers 745 262 334
Health and safety education for middle/senior-level workers 2,018 1,774 1,182
Health and safety education for general workers 131 588 915
Health and safety education for managers and supervisors 494 1,056 808
Education for employees in charge of safety education (including instructors) 114 229 197
Others - 294 67
16. Training and lecture      
  KYT training/ KYT leader training (KYT: Kiken Yochi Training (Hazard Prediction training)) 71 263 234
First aid training (including AED (Automated External Defibrillator)) 353 909 292
Prevention of heatstroke 2,032 9,900 6,291
Mental health and Health promotion 127 947 559
Traffic safety 2,348 6,276 3,225
Others 517 7,100 4,714
17. Other (education on a variety of qualifications and work) 1,677 709 774
18. Other (fire and earthquake drill) - 9,598 11,028
Total 27,247 55,338 54,348
  • Scope of aggregation: The scope of aggregation covers domestic companies, but does not include some non-production bases (head offices, sales offices, etc., which are primarily responsible for administrative affairs).

10. Social contribution

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Scope FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Total Amount of corporate donations (Million yen) Consolidated 435 225 119

11. Social contribution activities

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Group company Country/ Area Program
1. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Partnerships with Beekeepers
2. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Agricultural Partnerships.
3. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Action and Citizenship Project
4. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Improving access to the world information of the communities "Computer classes"
5. CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil UNIECO - Company-Community Integration Units
6. Pan Pac Napier, New Zealand Youth education
7. Pan Pac Hastings, New Zealand Environmental conservation
8. Pan Pac Hawke's Bay, New Zealand Environmental conservation
9. Pan Pac Maungataniwha, New Zealand Biodoversity enhancement
10. Pan Pac Hastings, New Zealand Sponsorship of Hawke’s Bay Rescue Helicopter Trust
11. QPFL Binh Dinh, Vietnam Dispatching a team of doctors to remote villages etc.

Governance

For latest information of corporate officers, click this page.

1. Structure of the Board of Directors

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Breakdown As of June 2021
Number of Directors 12
Number of Outside Directors 4
Number of Independent Outside Directors 4
Number of Female Director 2

2. Status of attendance at the Board of Director's Meeting

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Board of Director's Meeting in FY2020
Director, Chairman of the Board Susumu Yajima 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
President and CEO		 Masatoshi Kaku 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Senior Executive Officer		 Yoshiki Koseki 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Senior Executive Officer		 Ryuichi Kisaka 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Kazuhiko Kamada 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Hiroyuki Isono 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Koichi Ishida 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Fumio Shindo 14 / 14 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Shigeki Aoki
(Appointed June 2020)		 11 / 11 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Michihiro Nara 13 / 14 (92.9%)
Independent Outside Director Toshihisa Takata 14 / 14 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Sachiko Ai
(Appointed June 2020)		 10 / 11 (90.9%)

3. Structure and attendance of Nomination Committee

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Nomination Committee Meeting in FY 2020
Director, Chairman of the Board Susumu Yajima 1 / 1 (100%)
Director of the Board,
President and CEO		 Masatoshi Kaku 1 / 1 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Michihiro Nara 1 / 1 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Toshihisa Takata 1 / 1 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Sachiko Ai
(Appointed June 2020)		 1 / 1 (100%)

4. Structure and attendance of Compensation Committee

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Compensation Committee Meeting in FY 2020
Director, Chairman of the Board Susumu Yajima 2 / 2 (100%)
Director of the Board,
President and CEO		 Masatoshi Kaku 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Michihiro Nara 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Toshihisa Takata 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Sachiko Ai
(Appointed June 2020)		 1 / 1 (100%)

5. Structure of Audit & Supervisory Board

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Breakdown As of June 2021
Number of Audit & Supervisory Board members 5
Number of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board members 3
Number of Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board members 3

6. Status of attendance at the Audit & Supervisory Board Meeting

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Audit & Supervisory Board Meeting in FY 2020
Audit & Supervisory Board member Tomihiro Yamashita 14 / 14 (100%)
Audit & Supervisory Board member Nobuko Otsuka 14 / 14 (100%)
Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board member Makoto Katsura 14 / 14 (100%)
Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board member Mikinao Kitada 14 / 14 (100%)
Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board member Norio Henmi 10 / 10 (100%)
  • *The attendance of Norio Henmi , an Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member, covers the meetings of the Audit & Supervisory Board that were held up to the time of his retirement on November 29, 2020.

7. Total amount of remuneration, etc. fro Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members FY2020

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Position No. of Personnel Total remuneration (million yen) Fixed remuneration (million yen) Performance-linked remuneration (million yen)
Bonuses Stock-based remuneration
Director 15 565 280 169 116
(Independent Outside Director) (3) (41) (41) (-) (-)
Audit & Supervisory Board Member 5 86 86 - -
(Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member) (3) (35) (35) (-) (-)
Total 20 652 367 169 116
  • *Note:Numbers less than one million yen are rounded down to the nearest million.

8. Total amount of consolidated compensation for officers whose total amount of compensation is 100 million yen or more

Not applicable because there is no single person who receives a total amount of remuneration, etc. of 100 million yen or more.

9. Remuneration of the Company's Accounting Auditors

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2020
Remuneration of the Company's Accounting Auditors (million yen) 120
The amount required to be paid to Accounting Auditors by the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries
Total amount of other property benefits		 315

10. Political contribution amount

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2020
Political contribution amount (thousand yen) 1,056

11. Shares of the Company

12. Major shareholders top10 (As of September 2020)

13. Anti-corruption

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2020
Number of staff dismissed due to non-compliance with anti-corruption policies 0
Cost of fines, penalties or settlements in relation to corruption (yen) 0
Provisions for fines and settlements in relation to corruption (yen) 0

14. Number of whistleblowing cases received

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
Number of whistleblowing cases 86 119 131 114 140