ESG Data

ESG Data

  • Environment
  • Social
  • Governance

Environment

  • Data aggregation was performed in accordance with the Environment Accounting Guideline published by Japan's Ministry of the Environment
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Unless otherwise noted in the footnotes or tables, business sites of consolidated companies are included in the data, but non-production sites (primarily the main building, sales offices, and other sites that perform managerial and administrative work and sites where GHG and environment impact are extremely low) are excluded.
  • Aggregation period : Japan: April 1 - March 31 of each fiscal year, Overseas: January 1 - December 31 of each fiscal year (April 1 - March 31 in India and Myanmar)

1. Environment conservation cost1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: million yen)

Category Main initiatives FY2023
Investment Cost
1. Environment conservation costs for curbing environment impact generated by production and service activities within business sites 5,317 20,298
Breakdown ⅰ Environment conservation management costs Measures against air pollution, water pollution, noise and vibration, etc. 1,785 12,849
ⅱ Global environment conservation costs Cultivating company-owned forests in Japan, forest plantation operations outside Japan, energy conservation investments 2,203 752
ⅲ Resource circulation costs Efficient utilization of resources, costs for waste measures 1,328 6,696
2. Costs for curbing environment impact generated upstream or downstream by production and service activities Costs for purchasing low-sulfur fuel (balance amount) 0 310
3. Environment conservation cost related to administrative activities Employee education, ISO 14001 costs, costs for air and water analysis, costs for operating committees and other organizations, etc. 1 857
4. Environment conservation costs related to R&D activities Product development that contributes to environment conservation by promoting utilization of recovered paper, curbing environment impact that occurs during production, etc. 4,828 3,085
5. Environment conservation costs related to social activities Philanthropic programs, support for various environment groups, environment and sustainability reporting, Eco-Products exhibit, etc. 0 53
6. Costs related to environment damage Pollution impact levy (SOx) 0 468
Total 10,145 25,071
  • 1)Boundary of data aggregation: Companies in Japan of Oji Holdings, Oji Paper, Oji Materia, Oji F-Tex, Oji Imaging Media, Oji Nepia, Oji Cornstarch, Oji Tac, Oji Container, Morishigyo, Oji Green Resources, Oji Forest & Products
  • Expenditures for environmental conservation costs are expected to be about the same amount each year

1-1. Environmental liability1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: million yen)

Category Period Investment Cost
PCB waste disposal costs End of FY2026 0 340
  • 1)Amount(shadow cost) that we can reasonably project as of end of FY2023

2. Economic benefit associated with environment conservation activities1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: million yen)

Effect FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
Income from company-owned forests in Japan 411 415 432 428 563
Reduced expenses from energy saved 1,977 1,840 1,541 1,630 2,865
Income from recycling 3,542 3,439 3,552 3,612 3,575
Total 5,930 5,694 5,525 5,670 7,003
  • 1)Boundary of data aggregation: Companies in Japan of Oji Holdings, Oji Paper, Oji Materia, Oji F-Tex, Oji Imaging Media, Oji Nepia, Oji Cornstarch, Oji Tac, Oji Container, Morishigyo, Oji Green Resources, Oji Forest & Products

3. Greenhouse gas (GHG)1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY
2018		 FY
2019		 FY
2020		 FY
2021		 FY
20222)		 FY
2023		 Target value for 2023
Scope 1 (Direct emissions) Emission (kt-CO2e) 6,394 6,323 6,267 6,398 6,399 5,883 6,284
(98.2% in FY 2022)
Intensity (t-CO2e/ million yen) 4.123 4.194 4.611 4.405 3.750 3.468
Scope 2 (Indirect emissions) Emission (kt-CO2e) 1,442 1,327 1,193 1,208 1,071 959 1,051
(98.2% in FY 2022)
Intensity (t-CO2e/ million yen) 0.930 0.880 0.878 0.822 0.627 0.565
Scope 1+2 Emission (kt-CO2e) 7,836 7,650 7,460 7,606 7,470 6,842 7,336
(98.2% in FY 2022)
Intensity (t-CO2e/ Sales million yen) 5.052 5.074 5.489 5.173 4.377 4.034
Scope 1 breakdown by GHG type (kt-CO2e) CO2 6,832 6,623 6,413 6,536 6,394 6,503
CH4 148 149 149 148 148 107
N2O 856 878 898 922 928 232
HFC N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
PFC N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
SF6 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
NF3 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
Total 7,836 7,650 7,460 7,606 7,470 6,842
  • 1)Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
    Scope 1 Calculation
    Japan: Calculated in accordance with Act on Rationalizing Energy Use and Shifting to Non-fossil Energy (Energy Conservation Act) and Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (Global Warming Act)
    • Emissions relating to the electric power business (supply of electricity to other companies) and transport by Group-owned vehicles are included.
    Overseas: Calculated based on the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Standard
    • Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from waste incineration (without energy recovery) are excluded.
    • Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from waste disposal and wastewater treatment are excluded.
    • Non-energy greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions resulting from quicklime production (at lime kiln) are excluded.
    Scope 2 Calculation
    Japan: Basic emissions factors of individual electric power companies published by the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry
    Overseas: IEA-published CO2 emission factors by country in 2010
  • 2)For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.

4. Scope 3

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: kiloton-CO2e)

Category and Coverage FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY202216) FY2023
Domestic Overseas Total Domestic Overseas Total Domestic Overseas Total Domestic Overseas Total Domestic Overseas Total
  1. Purchased goods and services1)
 2,489 1,278 3,766 2,158 1,272 3,430 2,322 1,341 3,663 2,229 1,441 3,670 1,937 1,237 3,174
  1. Capital goods2)
 150 118 267 121 216 337 131 480 610 123 241 363 95 270 365
  1. Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)3)
 340 318 657 341 277 618 354 350 704 357 366 723 339 338 676
  1. Upstream transportation and distribution4)
 225 138 362 223 140 363 221 160 381 233 107 340 541 394 936
  1. Waste generated in operations5)
 18 60 77 19 12 31 23 47 69 17 21 39 23 52 75
  1. Business travel6)
 2 3 5 2 3 5 2 3 5 2 3 5 2 3 5
  1. Employee commuting7)
 8 11 19 7 11 18 7 12 19 7 12 19 7 15 23
  1. Upstream leased assets8)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. Downstream transportation and distribution9)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. Processing of sold products10)
 136 0 136 122 0 122 122 0 122 106 0 106 93 0 93
  1. Use of sold products11)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. End of life treatment of sold products12)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. Downstream leased assets13)
 ＜0.1 0 ＜0.1 ＜0.1 0 ＜0.1 ＜0.1 0 ＜0.1 ＜0.1 0 ＜0.1 ＜0.1 0 ＜0.1
  1. Franchises14)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  1. Investments15)
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 3,366 1,924 5,290 2,993 1,931 4,924 3,181 2,392 5,573 3,074 2,191 5,264 3,038 2,309 5,346
  • 1)Emissions associated with activities up to the point when materials/components, materials related to purchased goods and sale, etc. are manufactured. For emission intensities, we have referred to the “Emission intensity database for calculation of GHG emissions by organizations throughout the supply chain (ver. 3.2)” and the “CO2 equivalents common intensity database (ver. 4.0).” In FY2022 and earlier, part of the emissions from transportation of purchased goods were included in this category. In FY2023, we have changed the calculation method and such emissions are included in Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution.
  • 2)Emission from building and producing capital goods of our companies
  • 3)Emission from purchasing fuel, electricity, heats and generating electricity
  • 4)Emission from transportation and distribution of raw materials, parts, purchased goods and sales materials to our companies. In FY2022 and earlier, part of the emissions from transportation of purchased goods were included in Category 1: Purchased goods and services. In FY2023, we have changed the calculation method and such emissions are included in this category.
  • 5)Emission from transportation and disposal of waste generated in our companies
  • 6)Emission from business travel of employees
  • 7)Emission from employees commuting
  • 8)Emission from operation of leased assets that our companies leased. Calculated in Scope1, 2
  • 9)Emission from operating leased assets that our companies leased. Category 4 Includes transport, delivery (upstream).
  • 10)Processing of sold products; - Emission from processing of intermediate products by business operators
  • 11)Emission from use of products by users (consumers, business operators). Since the Group's main sales products, paper products, do not use energy during use, the Group considers that GHG emissions during product use are zero.
  • 12)Emission from transportation and disposal of products when disposing by users (consumers, business operators). The Group's main sales products are paper products, which emit CO2 when discarded. However, the Group's raw materials absorb CO2 when grown, so the Group's emissions are offset and considered to be zero.
  • 13)Downstream leased assets; - Emission from operating leased assets that our companies leased.
  • 14)Emission by franchises. Since the Group is not the president of the franchise, the emissions sources falling under this category are considered to be zero.
  • 15)Emission related with investments management. Since the Group is not an investment or financial institution, zero emissions sources are considered to fall under this category.
  • 16)For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.

5. Energy consumption

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Segment FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY20236)
Fuel type of using1)
(Electric power equivalent GWh)		 Oil 3,542 3,537 3,439 4,315 4,007
Coal 7,632 7,533 7,611 6,769 6,131
Gas 4,095 3,982 4,467 5,156 4,659
Purchased energy 3,852 3,603 3,472 2,907 2,449
Waste 7,273 7,284 7,552 7,181 7,581
Subtotal: Non-renewable energy 26,394 25,939 26,502 26,329 24,827
Black liquor (pulping by-product) 24,436 21,241 22,680 22,486 22,427
Other biomass 8,587 8,889 8,935 9,476 8,877
Hydro 375 360 366 367 368
Solar 5 5 5 5 8
Purchased energy 0 0 0 502 577
Subtotal: Renewable energy 33,404 30,495 31,987 32,837 32,257
Total 59,797 56,434 58,488 59,166 57,084
Total energy consumption2)
(Crude Oil equivalent)		 Consumption
(million liter)		 5,660 5,219 5,400 5,440 5,144
Intensity
(kilo-liter/t-production)		 0.365 0.365 0.359 0.363 0.343
Production capacity by energy type
(MW)		 Thermal power 3) 1,697 1,697 1,697 1,846 2,671
Hydro power 72 72 72 73 73
Solar power 4 4 4 5 8
Real power generation by energy type
(GWh/ yr) 4)		 Thermal power 7,969 7,864 7,985 8,297 8,310
Hydro power 350 360 366 367 368
Solar power 5 5 5 5 8
Real power consumption
(GWh /yr)		 Total power consumption 11,091 10,757 11,006 11,202 10,884
Renewable energy power in total power consumption 4,611 4,338 4,535 4,775 4,864
Purchased power from renewable energy5) 0 0 0 0 2
Biomass power generation companies
Power generation capacity by type
(MW)		 Biomass power generation 126 126 126 201 201
Energy input
(electric power equivalent GWh)		 Coal 32.2 37.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Oil 0.6 0.8 0.0 1.4 2.3
Biomass 668.1 968.9 986.1 1,140.1 1,516.5
Implied reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by FIT electric power sales6)
Implied reduction [kt-CO2e] 480 714
  • 1)Fuel type of using is calculted as follows.
    Fuel input calories (TJ) are converted to GWh by dividing by 3.6 (TJ/GWh).
    Energy input relating to the electric power business (supply of electricity to other parties) is included.
    Energy input relating to transport by Group-owned vehicles is excluded.
    The sources of unit calorific values are the following laws and international standards.
    Japan: Act on Rationalizing Energy use and Shifting to Non-fossil Energy (Energy Conservation Act) and Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (Global Warming Act)
    Overseas: IPCC 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
  • 2)Energy consumption: Energy consumption in conjunction with the manufacture of products is calculated.
    Consumption relating to the electric power business (supply of electricity to other parties) and transport by Group-owned vehicles is excluded.
    The sources of unit calorific values are the following laws and international standards.
    Japan: Act on Rationalizing Energy use and Shifting to Non-fossil Energy (Energy Conservation Act) and Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (Global Warming Act)
    Overseas: IPCC 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
  • 3)Thermal power generation includes power generation capacity of spare facilities. Thermal power generation refers to the sum of oil, coal, gas, waste and biomass burning alone and mixed burning.
  • 4)The total amount of electricity consumed in-house and sold is shown in the figure.
  • 5)Enter the amount of purchased electricity that can be proved to be derived from renewable energy, such as the Green Power Certification.
  • 6)The amount of reduction is estimated based on the premise that electric power sale under the Feed-in Tariff (FIT) scheme for renewable energy indirectly reduces the CO2 emissions associated with electric power users.
    Implied reduction = amount of FIT electric power sales x national average emission factor
    FIT electric power sales: The amount of electricity from biomass, hydroelectric, and solar power generation sold under the FIT scheme by Group companies in Japan
    National average emission factor: An emission factor used in the calculation of the equivalent amount of CO2 reduced by using non-fossil electric power under the greenhouse gas emissions calculation, reporting, and disclosure system
  • 7)For sites that had trouble in collecting data due to natural disasters, FY2022 data are estimates calculated using production volumes and actual FY2019-2021 data.

6. Acquisition status of environment management system (EMS)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment As of March 31, 2020 As of March 31, 2021 As of March 31, 2022 As of March 31, 2023 As of March 31, 2024
Number of sites covered by ISO14001 148 148 148 149 157
Percentage of sites covered by ISO14001 (%) 52 50 50 51 52

7. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
Number of environment-related violations1) 2 0 3 5 8
Administrative penalties, including environment-related fines and suspensions of operations No occurrence No occurrence No occurrence No occurrence No occurrence
  • 1)Violation of environmental laws and regulations regarding water withdrawal, wastewater, air, waste, etc.
    The external impact of the violation is minor and has not caused any complaints from local residents.

8. Environmental burden substances1) (BOD, COD, and SS) in wastewater and drainage amount

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY20223) FY2023 Target value for 2023
BOD emission (t) 7,740 7,567 7,013 5,615 5,101 -
Emission intensity (kg/ t-production) 0.50 0.53 0.47 0.37 0.34 -
(kg/million yen) 5.13 5.57 4.77 3.29 3.01 -
Emission intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate2) (base year) 9.9% -5.9% -35.1% -40.7% -
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) Not achieved
(5.00)		 Not achieved
(4.93)		 Achieved
(4.87)		 Achieved
(4.80)		 Achieved
(4.74)		 -
COD emission (t) 35,038 32,897 35,862 34,610 34,519 32,637
Emission intensity (kg/ t-production) 2.26 2.30 2.38 2.31 2.30 -
(kg/million yen) 23.24 24.21 24.39 20.28 20.35 -
Emission intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate2) 3.2% 7.5% 8.3% -10.0% -9.6% -
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) Not achieved
(22.22)		 Not achieved
(21.92)		 Not achieved
(21.62)		 Achieved
(21.33)		 Achieved
(21.04)		 -
SS emission (t) 16,391 14,639 14,710 13,715 12,654 -
Emission intensity (kg/ t-production) 1.06 1.02 0.98 0.91 0.84 -
(kg/million yen) 10.87 10.77 10.01 8.04 7.46 -
Emission intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate2) 2.8% 1.9% -5.4% -24.0% -29.4% -
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) Not achieved
(10.43)		 Not achieved
(10.29)		 Achieved
(10.15)		 Achieved
(10.01)		 Achieved
(9.88)		 -
Total wastewater (1,000 m3) 701,024 671,965 675,849 672,780 672,275 -
Wastewater destination River and lake 276,668 272,294 269,339 255,872 244,025 -
Sea 338,822 322,542 326,949 321,287 319,470 -
Groundwater 7 14 12 22 21 -
Sewer 85,527 77,115 79,471 95,599 108,759 -
  • 1)BOD (Biochemical oxygen demand), COD (Chemical oxygen demand), SS (Suspended solids)
    Boundary of data aggregation; all consolidated companies that be regulated with wastewater.
  • 2)Emissions intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate target: Reduce by 15% in FY 2030 compared to FY 2018
  • 3)For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.

8-1. AOX in wastewater1) (kg/t-pulp)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Measuring Site Country FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
Jiangsu Oji Paper China 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.006 0.002
CENIBRA Brazil 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10
Oji FS (Kinleith) New Zealand 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.15 0.15
  • 1）The amount of AOX in wastewater from overseas pulp mills averaged 0.001-0.16 (kg/t-pulp).
    It is well below the AOX amount of 0.2 (kg/t-pulp) published in EU BAT (Best Available Technology) 2010.
    There is no regulation value for the amount of wastewater AOX from pulp mills in Japan, and the results of a survey conducted by the Japan Paper Association as the secretariat proved that AOX can be controlled through ECF conversion, and the survey was completed in 2006.

9. Amount of environment burden substances in emitted gas1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY20224) FY2023
SOx emission (t) 5,704 5,529 5,424 5,955 5,052
Emission intensity (kg/t-production) 0.37 0.39 0.36 0.40 0.34
(kg/million yen) 3.78 4.07 3.69 3.49 2.98
Emission intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate2) -8.2% -1.3% -10.5% -15.4% -27.8%
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) Achieved
(4.07)		 Not achieved
(4.01)		 Achieved
(3.96)		 Achieved
(3.90)		 Achieved
(3.85)
NOx emission (t) 13,024 10,958 12,385 11,595 12,291
Emission intensity (kg/t-production) 0.84 0.77 0.82 0.77 0.82
(kg/million yen) 8.64 8.06 8.42 6.79 7.25
Dust emission (t) 3,097 3,148 3,143 2,800 2,958
Emission intensity (kg/t-production) 0.20 0.22 0.21 0.19 0.20
(kg/million yen) 2.05 2.32 2.14 1.64 1.74
VOC emission (t) 481 227 232 182 159
Emission intensity3) (kg/t-production) 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01
(kg/million yen) 0.32 0.17 0.16 0.11 0.09
  • 1)Boundary of data aggregation
    • SOx, NOx and Dust: all consolidated companies that be regulated.
    • VOC: Domestic Group companies subject to Japanese Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR) law have been included. Of the substances subject to PRTR law, those corresponding to the 100 types of VOC indicated by the Ministry of the Environment based on the Air Pollution Control Act have been included.
  • 2)Emissions intensity (kg/million yen) reduction rate target: Reduce by 15% in FY 2030 compared to FY 2018
  • 3)Emissions intensity (kg/million yen) target: 0.305 (FY 2010 performance x 50%) or less
  • 4)For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.

10. Waste and PRTR chemical substances

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY20224) FY2023
Industrial waste generation1) Domestic (kt) 1,458 1,347 1,410 1,420 1,353
Overseas (kt) 1,299 1,386 1,363 1,569 1,664
Total (kt) 2,757 2,733 2,772 2,989 3,017
Generation intensity (kg/t-production) 177.8 191.0 184.3 199.3 201.2
(kg/million yen) 1,829 2,011 1,886 1,752 1,779
Efficient use amount (kt) 2,586 2,570 2,611 2,720 2,776
Landfill amount (Final disposal amount) Domestic (kt) 23 17 13 9 14
Overseas (kt) 149 146 149 260 227
Total (kt) 172 163 161 269 241
Landfill intensity (kg/t-production) 11.1 11.4 10.7 17.9 16.1
(kg/million yen) 114 120 110 158 142
Effective waste utilization rate2) Domestic (%) 98.4 98.8 99.1 99.4 99.0
Overseas (%) 88.5 89.4 89.1 83.4 86.4
Hazardous waste generation amount (t) 8,723 11,832 8,623 11,197 10,247
Generation intensity (kg/t-production) 0.56 0.83 0.57 0.75 0.68
(kg/million yen) 5.79 8.71 5.87 6.56 6.04
PRTR Chemical substance released amount and transferred amount3) (t) 750 440 482 420 685
Released and transferred intensity (kg/t-production) 0.048 0.031 0.032 0.028 0.046
(kg/million yen) 0.50 0.32 0.33 0.25 0.41
  • 1)The volume of waste generated includes valuable materials (general waste is not included).
  • 2)Effective waste utilization ratio = (Amount of waste generated − Amount of landfill waste) ÷ Amount of waste generated × 100
    Target: 99% or more in Japan, 95% or more overseas in FY 2030
    Final disposal rate in Japan 1% or less
    Final disposal rate overseas 5% or less
    Final waste disposal ratio=Amount of landfill waste÷Amount of waste generated×100
  • 3)PRTR data cover all consolidated companies that submit the notifications of PRTR
  • 4)For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.

11. Amounts of substances subject to the PRTR Law released and transferred

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(FY 2023)

Chemical Substance (unit) Handled amount including generated amount Amount Released Amount Transferred Total Amount
Water-soluble compounds of zinc (t) 4.7 - 0.1 0.1
Butyl acrylate (t) 3.7 0.1 0.7 0.9
2-Aminoethanol (t) 10.6 0.006 0.1 0.1
Asbestos (t) 2.2 - 2.2 2.2
Isoprene (t) 8.8 0.1 - 0.1
Ethylbenzene (t) 6.4 0.1 0.3 0.4
Ethylene oxide (t) 1.8 0.01 - 0.01
Xylene (t) 24.5 0.3 0.6 0.9
Chromium and trivalent chromium compounds (t) 15.0 0.002 0.004 0.01
Chloroform (t) 12.3 12.3 - 12.3
Vinyl acetate (t) 310.4 0.7 0.6 1.3
Cyclohexylamine (t) 2.3 2.3 - 2.3
2,2-Dibromo-2-cyanoacetamide (t) 59.2 25.3 1.4 26.7
Styrene (t) 73.6 - 0.2 0.2
Dioxins (mg-TEQ) 622.4 288.9 333.6 622.4
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (t) 2.1 1.3 - 1.3
Toluene (t) 1,626.7 134.9 141.6 276.5
Nickel (t) 12.1 0.005 0.004 0.01
Phenol (t) 2.9 0.01 0.1 0.1
Hydrogen fluoride（ton） 1.8 1.8 - 1.8
Hexane (t) 11.0 0.1 0.1 0.2
Benzene (t) 8.4 7.1 - 7.1
Boron compounds (t) 228.3 17.5 1.3 18.8
Poly (oxyethylene) alkyl ether (alkyl C=12-15) (t) 2.7 1.6 0.1 1.7
Sodium poly (oxyethylene) dodecyl ether sulfate (t) 2.8 1.7 - 1.7
Formaldehyde (t) 1.0 0.8 0.01 0.8
Manganese and its compounds (t) 5.6 5.6 0.0002 5.6
Methylnaphthalene (t) 343.0 1.7 - 1.7
Methylenebis (4.1-phenylene) = diisocyanate (t) 2.8 - 0.1 0.1
2-Ethylhexyl acrylate (t) 12.3 - 1.1 1.1
Polycondensation products of adipic acid / (N-(2-aminoethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine or N,N'-bis(2-aminoethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine) / 2-(chloromethyl)oxirane (t)　 182.6 42.5 3.0 45.5
Mixture of polyaddition products of oxirane to alkan-1-amine (limited to those the alkane is linear chain and C=8,10,12,14,16 or 18 and the mixture thereof), polyaddition products of oxirane to (Z)-octadec-9-en-1-amine and polyaddition products of oxirane to (9Z,12Z)-octadeca-9,12-dien-1-amine (t) 122.1 96.6 0.2 96.8
alpha-Alkyl-omega-hydroxypoly(oxyethane-1,2-diyl) (limited to those the alkyl group is C=16-18 and the mixture thereof, and the number average molecular weight is less than 1,000), alpha-alkenyl-omega-hydroxypoly(oxyethane-1,2-diyl) (limited to those the alkenyl group is C=16-18 and the mixture thereof, and the number average molecular weight is less than 1,000), and the mixture thereof (t) 4.1 0.02 0.005 0.02
alpha-Alkyl-omega-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) (limited to those the alkyl group is C=9-11 and mixture thereof, and the number average molecular weight is less than 1,000) (t) 13.3 8.0 - 8.0
Salt of alkyl(benzyl)(dimethyl)ammonium (limited to those the alkyl group is C=12-16 and mixture thereof) (t) 7.7 6.2 - 6.2
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and its potassium and sodium salts (t) 43.6 35.6 0.7 36.3
Chloric acid and its potassium and sodium salt (t) 15,641.4 11.0 - 11.0
Diethanolamine (t) 18.5 6.4 0.5 6.9
Diethylene glycol monobutyl ether (t) 2.8 2.8 - 2.8
Trimethylbenzene (t) 23.5 0.1 0.05 0.1
Salt of bis(alkyl)(dimethyl)ammonium (limited to those the alkyl group is linear chain and C=12, 14, 16, 18 or 20 and the mixture thereof) (t) 2.0 0.2 - 0.2
(1-Hydroxyethane-1,1-diyl)diphosphonic acid and its potassium salt and sodium salt (t) 108.6 84.2 1.0 85.1
Hexahydro-1,3,5-tris(2-hydroxyethyl)-1,3,5-triazine (t) 1.5 - 0.002 0.002
Hexanedihydrazide (t) 14.6 - 2.8 2.8
Heptane (t) 13.0 0.003 2.3 2.3
Methyl isobutyl ketone (t) 1.8 0.1 0.3 0.3
2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethanol (t) 37.4 13.8 1.4 15.2
Total 19,038 523 163 685
  • The Data covers all consolidated companies that submit the notifications of PRTR.
  • Excluding dioxins, numbers prepared for substances of which one ton or more (0.5 tons or more Specified Class 1 Designated Chemical Substances) is handled ( including amount produced).

12. Usage of main raw materials1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Main raw materials FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 2) FY2023
Woodchip and lumber (kt) 13,171 11,940 12,421 12,748 14,315
Recovered paper (kt) 4,339 4,374 4,411 4,699 4,493
Pulp (kt) 328 312 308 313 382
Purchased containerboard and corrugated sheet (kt) 3,262 3,212 3,424 3,562 3,373
Total (kt) 21,100 19,838 20,564 21,321 22,563
  • 1)Amount includes intra-group transaction
  • 2)For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.

13. Water resource

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 2) FY2023 Target value for 2023
Water intake (1,000 m3) 736,684 706,298 714,281 709,966 694,820 721,347
Water intake intensity (m3/ t-production) 47.5 49.3 47.5 47.3 46.3 -
(m3/ million yen) 488.6 519.7 485.9 416.0 409.6 -
Water intake intensity (m3/million yen) reduction rate1) 2.4% 8.9% 1.8% -12.9% -14.2% -
Evaluation against annual target (annual target value) Not achieved
(474.9)		 Not achieved
(472.4)		 Not achieved
(470.0)		 Achieved
(467.5)		 Achieved
(465.1)		 -
Breakdown of water intake
(1,000 m3)		 Surface water
(river, lake)		 483,096 463,175 465,801 453,127 442,971 -
Surface water
(sea)		 9,658 9,130 9,307 9,386 9,370 -
Groundwater
(well water, subsoil water)		 132,887 127,843 127,039 130,780 127,823 -
Third party organization
(water supply, city water)		 111,043 106,151 112,134 116,673 114,657 -

Changes in water consumption

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 2) FY2023
Water intake (1,000 m3) 736,684 706,298 714,281 709,966 694,820
Wastewater (1,000 m3) 701,024 671,965 675,849 672,780 672,275
Water consumption (1,000 m3) 35,659 34,333 38,432 37,186 22,545
Water consumption intensity (m3/t-production) 2.30 2.40 2.55 2.48 1.50
(m3/ million yen) 23.65 25.26 26.14 21.79 13.29
  • 1)Water intake intensity (m3/million yen) reduction rate target: Reduce by 6% in 2030 compared to FY 2018
  • 2)For the site that experienced difficulties in collecting data due to natural disasters, estimates were calculated using production volumes and actual data for FY2019-2021.

14. Water intensity in electric power business1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
Gross generation (MWh) 700,887 1,006,844 986,135 1,141,497 1,518,767
Water intake (m3) 2,090,868 2,662,414 2,684,595 3,095,703 4,131,986
Water intensity (m3/MWh) 2.98 2.64 2.72 2.71 2.72
  • 1) Electric power companies (Oji Green Energy Nichinan Co. Ltd., Oji Green Energy Ebetsu Co. Ltd., Oji Green Energy Tokushima Co., Ltd., MPM Oji Eco Energy Co., Ltd.)

15. Recovered paper utilization

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
Paper and paperboard production amount1) Paper (kt) 2,902 2,287 2,441 2,412 2,267
Paperboard (kt) 3,201 3,116 3,189 3,316 3,032
Total (kt) 6,104 5,403 5,630 5,728 5,299
Recovered paper used amount2) Paper (kt) 872 728 661 624 590
Paperboard (kt) 3,138 3,098 3,174 3,182 2,983
Total (kt) 4,010 3,826 3,834 3,806 3,577
Recovered paper utilization ratio2) Paper (%) 30.9 30.9 27.6 27.5 28.4
Paperboard (%) 95.4 95.9 95.4 94.8 94.7
Total (%) 65.6 68.5 67.1 67.6 68.3
Target2) (%) 65.0 65.0 70.0 70.0 70.0
Achievement rate (%) 100.9 105.3 95.8 96.6 97.6
  • 1)Paper and paperboard production amount in Japan
  • 2)Aggregation period: From January to December for the amount of recovered paper use, from April to March for recovered paper utilization ratio
    Scope of data aggregation: Companies in Japan of Oji Paper, Oji Materia, Oji F-Tex, Oji Nepia
    Recovered paper utilization ratio = Volume of recovered paper consumed ÷ Total volume of fiber raw materials consumed (total consumption of recovered paper, wood pulp, and other fiber raw materials)
    Target for recovered paper utilization ratio: 65% from FY2016 to FY2020, 70% or above from FY2021 to FY2030

16. Environment-related data by segment

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(FY2023)

Operating
sites		 Production
(kt)		 GHG Water
resource		 Industrial
waste		 Domestic
chemical
substances		 Environmental
burden
in wastewater		 Environmental
burden
in emission gas
Emissio
(kt-CO2e)		 Intensity
(tCO2e/ t-production)		 Water intake
(1,000 m3)		 Intensity
(m3/ t-production)		 Final disposal amount
(t-Appearance)		 Intensity
(kg/ t-production)		 PRTR chemical substances
(t-released and transferred)		 Intensity
(g/ t-production)		 BOD
(t)		 COD
(t)		 SS
(t)		 SOx
(t-SO2 conversion)		 NOx
(t-NO2 conversion)		 Soot and Dust
(t)
Industrial Material Business
173 6,607 2,638 0.399 184,974 28.0 73,189 11.1 186 28 1,961 4,813 1,759 2,013 2,413 206
Household and Consumer Product Business
8 204 83 0.406 2,694 13.2 86 0.4 25 122 (*1) 108 19 <1 9 10
Functional Materials Business
32 560 396 0.706 37,160 66.3 4,390 7.8 225 402 324 103 145 84 211 10
Forest Resources and Environment Marketing Business
51 4,325 733 0.169 117,805 27.2 152,002 35.1 0.2 0.05 2,100 12,460 3,316 106 3,976 2,379
Printing and Communications Media Business
7 3,270 2,969 0.908 351,662 107.5 10,687 3.3 249 76 711 17,033 7,409 2,849 5,678 351
Other business
37 31 24 0.785 524 16.9 254 8.2 1 35 5 1 6 0 4 0
Total (consolidated companies)
308 14,998 6,842 0.456 694,820 46.3 240,608 16.1 685 46 5,101 34.519 12,654 5,052 12,291 2,956
  • Production volume includes the volume of transactions within the group.
  • See note under "3. Greenhouse Gases (GHG)" for the calculation method of GHG emissions.
  • The environmental impact (BOD, COD, SS) of water emissions and the environmental impact (SOx, NOx, soot and dust) of air emissions are the amounts of emissions from business sites to which regulations are applied.
  • Note:(*1) Emissions not listed because there are no sites where regulations are applied.

17. Forest certification acquisition rate1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
Overseas Forest Plantations Forest Certification Area (ha) 222,545 211,907 213,821 237,328 242,375
Forest Certification Rate 94% 91% 92% 94% 97%
Company-owned Forests in Japan (excluding shared forests) Forest Certification Area (ha) 172,426 172,420 172,410 172,410 173,129
Forest Certification Rate 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Overall forest certification rate 96% 95% 96% 96% 98%
  • 1)Overseas: Area ratio in company-owned production forests, Japan: Area ratio in company-owned forests excluding shared forests

18. Oji Group forest area

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

As of March 2024

Country （Area) Operating company / Business overview Year established Production forests (ha) Conseveation forests (ha) Total(ha) Forest certification code
New Zealand (South Island) Southland Plantation Forest Company of New Zealand Ltd. (SPFL) 1992 10,254 3,067 13,321 NC-FM/COC-001130
Australia (Western Australia) Albany Plantation Forest Company of Australia Ltd. (APFL) 1993 3,502 1,325 4,827 SA-CW/FM-006020
Vietnam（Bin Dinh) Quy Nhon Plantation Forest Company of Vietnam Ltd. (QPFL) 1995 8,581 1,000 9,581 SGSCH-FM/COC-002539
Australia (Victoria) Green Triangle  Plantation Forest Company of Australia Pty. Ltd. (GPFL) 1997 2,534 0 2,534  
Indonesia (Kalimantan) PT Korintiga Hutani (KTH) 1998 62,678 19,139 81,817 FSC CW: SGS-CW/FM-009866、
FSC COC: SGSHK-COC-009871、
PEFC FM: AJA/IFCC-PEFC/FMC-HT/00038/I/2018、
PEFC COC:AJAEU/PEFC/18/00088
Vietnam (Phu Yen) Truong Thanh Oji Plantation Forest Company Limited (TTO) 2011 2,288 254 2,542 SGSCH-FM/COC-011627
Brazil (Minas Gerais) Celulose Nipo-Brasileira S.A (CENIBRA) 1973 142,661 106,505 249,166 IMA-FM/COC-007629
IMA-MF-0010
New Zealand (North island) Pan Pac Forest Products Ltd. (PAN PAC) 1971 34,999 5,083 40,082 SGSCH-FM/COC-000850
New Zealand (North island) Oji Fibre Solutions (OjiFS) 2014 7,190 626 7,816 NC-FM/COC-000190
Overseas subtotal 274,687 136,999 411,686  
Japan 176,805 11,552 188,357 SGEC-FM：JAFTA-002, JAFTA-008, JAFTA-012
SGEC-CoC：JAFTA-SGEC-COC-025
Total 451,492 148,551 600,043  

19. Procurement volume of wood chips and market pulp for Oji Group

Wood chip

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Origin FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 Raw material composition
(k BDT) (%) (k BDT) (%) (k BDT) (%) (k BDT) (%) (k BDT) (%)
Japan 943.1 20% 775.1 21% 813.0 18% 774.0 17% 683.2 15% Sawmill residue
Vietnam 922.2 19% 737.3 20% 1,018.4 23% 980.8 21% 1,022.5 23% Planted tree
Thailand 964.4 20% 697.5 19% 750.4 17% 949.5 21% 925.8 21% Planted tree
Indonesia 349.2 7% 364.1 10% 440.5 10% 425.0 9% 527.5 12% Planted tree
Australia 649.3 13% 358.5 10% 562.8 13% 735.7 16% 656.9 15% Planted tree
U.S.A. 253.0 5% 243.7 7% 284.2 6% 326.1 7% 291.6 7% Sawmill residue
Chile 293.8 6% 189.7 5% 238.8 5% 175.3 4% 188.9 4% Planted tree
New Zealand 148.2 3% 109.0 3% 162.6 4% 115.2 2% 58.4 1% Planted tree
Malaysia 141.0 3% 98.3 3% 64.8 1% 54.8 1% 29.0 1% Planted tree
Fiji 94.2 2% 88.6 22% 93.8 2% 85.8 2% 69.4 2% Planted tree
South Africa 76.4 2% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% 0.0 0% Planted tree
Total 4,834.7 100% 3,661.8 100% 4,429.3 100% 4,622.2 100% 4,453.1 100%  
  • We have confirmed that 100% of the wood chips are wood raw materials that meet FSC™ certifiied materials and FSC™ requirements.

Market pulp

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Origin FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 Raw material composition
(k ADT) (%) (k ADT) (%) (k ADT) (%) (k ADT) (%) (k ADT) (%)
Brazil 66.5 34% 64.6 48% 81.6 50% 109.3 60% 90.9 62% Planted tree
New Zealand 67.7 35% 35.4 27% 35.2 22% 0.3 0% 0 0% Planted tree, Sawmil residue
Canada 34.0 17% 18.0 13% 15.5 10% 18.2 10% 12.7 9% Regrowth forest
Japan 12.1 6% 8.5 6% 17.4 11% 36.6 20% 29.1 20% Sawmill residue
Sweden 8.5 4% 3.8 3% 5.4 3% 11.0 6% 8.5 6% Planted tree
U.S.A 5.2 3% 2.6 2% 3.6 2% 3.6 2% 3.1 2% Planted tree, Sawmil residue
Finland 0.4 0% 0.4 0% 1.8 1% 1.5 1% 0.3 0% Planted tree
Chile 0.0 0% 0.2 0% 1.1 1% 2.0 1% 1.5 1% Planted tree
Total 194.4 100% 133.5 100% 161.6 100% 182.5 100% 146.1 100%  
  • We have confirmed that 100% of the the market pulp are wood raw materials that meet FSC™ certifiied materials and FSC™ requirements.

20. Carbon stocks and net increment in carbon stocks by production and conservation forest

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 5 year average
Carbon stocks1) 4) 5) (kt-CO2) 112,081 115,362 119,415 122,453 124,559 -
Net increment in carbon stocks2) 4) 5) (kt-CO2/yr) 312 750 2,265 583 2,159 1,214
Forest area covered3) 4) 5) (1,000 ha) 542 537 549 549 546 -
  • 1)Actual carbon stocks in living biomass
  • 　 Production forest: Actual merchantable volume at the end of each fiscal year x Biomass expansion coefficient x (1+underground / above-ground ratio) x Wood density x Carbon ratio x CO2 conversion coefficient.
  • 　 Conservation forest: Remaining area at the end of each fiscal year x above-ground biomass of natural forest x (1+underground / above-ground ratio) x carbon ratio x CO2 conversion coefficient.
  • 2)Net increment in carbon stocks by forests
    Production forest: CO2 absorption by growth - CO2 emission by felling
  • 　 Conservation forest: Remaining area at the end of each fiscal year x Annual growth rate of above-ground biomass x (1+underground / above-ground ratio) x carbon ratio x CO2 conversion coefficient.
  • 3)Forest area in the scope of calculation for carbon stocks and net increment in carbon stocks covers consolidated companies in line with GHG emissions.
  • 4)From 2021, for CNB, the calculated value (third-party guarantee) by CNB was applied to the overall total. Revised in the same way for 2018-2020.
  • 5)KTH was consolidated in FY2022. KTH data was also added to the FY 2018-2021 data.

21. Net GHG emissions

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2018
(Base year)		 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 5 year average
GHG emissions (Scope 1+2) (kt-CO2e/yr) 7,836 7,650 7,460 7,606 7,470 6,842 7,405
Net increment in carbon stocks (kt-CO2e/yr) 686 312 750 2,265 583 2,159 1,214
Net GHG emissions (kt-CO2e/yr) 7,095 7,341 6,720 5,344 6,883 4,683 6,192
GHG reduction rate - -6% -14% -32% -12% -40% -21%

22. Environmental conservation activities

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Country Area Group company Program
Japan Hokkaido Oji Forest & Products Sarufutsu Itou Conservation Activities
Japan Kochi Oji Forest & Products Measures to Protect the Fairy Pitta (Koyagauchi company-owned forest in Kochi Prefecture)
Japan Hokkaido Oji Forest & Products Conservation activities for endangered alpine plants
Japan Yamanashi Oji Forest & Products Lily-of-the-Valley Habitat Conservation
Brazil Minas Gerais CENIBRA Mutum Project
Brazil Minas Gerais CENIBRA Initiatives for preserving biodiversity
New Zealand Hawke's Bay Pan Pac Conservation activity for Kiwi
New Zealand Hawke's Bay Pan Pac Efforts to preserve and restore indigenous forest
New Zealand Hawke's Bay Pan Pac Supporting Environmental conservation projects through Pan Pac Environmental Trust
New Zealand Southland SPFL Identification and protection of Rare, Threatened and Endangered (RTE) species

23. Nature-related metrics and targets 1)

Nature-related comprehensive and measurable metrics and targets to avoid and reduce key drivers of the nature loss and to restore and regenerate ecosystems

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Metrics Targets 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Area of natural forest restored by CENIBRA (Brazil) on its land (ha) At least 3,000 ha between 2024-2033 170 366 399 379 359
Number of native tree species planted by CENIBRA (Brazil) on its land (seedlings) At least 500,000 seedlings between 2024-2033 34,827 60,624 76,433 61,599 27,480
Area of ecological corridors formed by CENIBRA (Brazil) outside its land 2) (ha) At least 3,500 ha between 2024-2033 186 318 313 411 532
Area of natural forests connected by ecological corridors formed by CENIBRA (Brazil) (ha) - 1,281 2,212 2,239 1,268 2,587
  • 1)Targets were considered and set in accordance with the LEAP approach* implemented by Oji Holdings with the assistance of KPMG AZSA LLC.
    • *An integrated approach developed by TNFD (Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures). It assesses and manages nature-related issues in four phases: Locate, Evaluate, Assess, and Prepare.
      Locate the interfaces with nature across geographies, sectors and value chains.
      Evaluate dependencies and impacts on nature.
      Assess nature-related risks and opportunities to the organizsation.
      Prepare to respond to nature-related risks and opportunities, including target setting.
  • 2)The area fenced and protected to promote revegetation of degraded areas and movement of wildlife between fragmented natural forests.
    Ecological corridors are also referred to as “wildlife corridors” or “green corridors”.

The validity of the metrics and targets was reviewed by a third party, Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd.

Result of review by a third party

24. Proximity of Operating Locations to Areas Important for Biodiversity 1)

  • 1)Areas important for biodiversity referenced from UNEP-WCMC (2023) Global Critical Habitat Screening Layer (Version 2.0)
  • 2)Priority locations were considered and identified in accordance with the LEAP approach*.
    • *An integrated approach developed by TNFD (Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures). It assesses and manages nature-related issues in four phases: Locate, Evaluate, Assess, and Prepare.
      Locate the interfaces with nature across geographies, sectors and value chains.
      Evaluate dependencies and impacts on nature.
      Assess nature-related risks and opportunities to the organizsation.
      Prepare to respond to nature-related risks and opportunities, including target setting.
Summary of consideration using LEAP approach

Social

1. Employees

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment Boundary of data aggregation As of Mar 31,
2020		 As of Mar 31,
2021		 As of Mar 31,
2022		 As of Mar 31,
2023		 As of Mar 31,
2024
Number of permanent employees Consolidated 36,810 36,034 35,608 37,845 38,322
Number of temporary employees Consolidated 2,507 2,335 2,467 5,115 4,708
Men and women rates (%) Consolidated (Male) 81.45 81.39 81.34 83.12 81.38
Consolidated (Female) 18.55 18.61 18.66 16.88 18.62
Permanent employees voluntary turnover rates (%) Oji HD 1) 3.48 4.61 5.06 5.40 2.10
Oji MO 2) 3.85 1.47 2.94 5.88 3.09
  • 1) Oji HD; Oji Holdings Corporation (Non-consolidated)
  • 2) Oji MO; Oji Management Office Inc.

2. Percentage of female managers1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
Percentage of female managers (%) 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.9
  • 1) Aggregation date: March 31 of each fiscal year
    Boundary of data aggregation: 16 Group companies in Japan (with 301 or more employees at the beginning of aggregation in September 2015)
    Percentage of female managers = Number of female managers ÷ Number of all managers

3. Number of new hires for generalist-track positions

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Number of of female new hires for generalist-track positions Number of of male new hires for generalist-track positions Total Percentage of female new hires for generalist-track positions (%)
FY2018 18 18 36 38.3
FY2019 18 18 36 34
FY2020 15 15 30 30.6
FY2021 15 35 50 30
FY2022 16 24 40 40
FY2023 20 33 53 37.7
FY2024 28 41 69 40.6
  • Oji Management Office batch recruitment (excluding sports recruits)

4. Employment rate of people with disabilities1)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
Six applicable Group companies in Japan (%) 2.27 2.31 2.35 2.51 2.48
83 companies in Japan (%) 2.01 2.04 2.10 2.20 2.19
  • 1) Aggregation date: June 1 after each fiscal year
    Boundary of data aggregation
    • Six applicable Group companies in Japan: Oji Holdings, Oji Nepia, Oji Imaging Media, Oji Paper, Oji Management Office, and Oji Clean Mate
    • Eighty-three companies in Japan: Eighty-three companies in Japan that have at least 43.5 employees and are required to hire at least one person with disabilities under the FY2023 statutory employment rate of 2.3% (including the six applicable Group companies)
    Employment rate of people with disabilities (actual employment rate) = Number of regular workers with physical or intellectual impairments or with mental illness ÷ Number of all regular workers (Workers with short working hours are counted as 0.5 workers and persons with severe disabilities are counted as two persons)

5. Annual total working hours

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
Annual total working hours (hours / person-year) 1,827 1,819 1,843 1,830 1,835
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Oji Group Tokyo Headquarters Area (26 companies)

6. Human rights violations

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
Number of human rights violations (cases) 4 4 2 4 6
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Consolidated companies in Japan
  • All of the human rights violations disclosed to the public were harassment cases (power harassment and sexual harassment) revealed through the internal reporting system. In each case, measures were taken to prevent recurrence after internal disciplinary actions were taken.

7. Number of worksites acquired ISO45001 certification

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment As of May 2020*2 As of May 2021*3 As of May 2022*4 As of May 2023*5 As of May 2024
Number of worksites acquired ISO45001 certification / Number of all worksites 4 (309) 10 (311) 10 (314) 16 (315) 24 (344)
  • ・Boundary of data aggregation: Consolidated companies

8. Lost time injury frequency rate and severity rate for safety

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
LTIFR1) Oji Group Whole Group 0.88 0.81 0.97 1.12 1.20
Japan 0.67 0.76 0.84 0.88 0.80
Overseas 1.08 0.85 1.09 1.29 1.49
Manufacturing3) 1.20 1.21 1.31 1.25 1.29
Pulp, paper and paper product manufacturing3) 1.94 1.54 1.85 1.59 1.38
Severity rate2) Oji Group Whole Group 0.12 0.12 0.05 0.35 0.23
Japan 0.22 0.23 0.05 0.49 0.04
Overseas 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.25 0.36
Manufacturing3) 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.08
Pulp, paper and paper product manufacturing3) 0.63 0.39 0.06 0.19 0.05
  • ・Aggregation period: From January 1 to December 31, Boundary of data aggregation: Oji Holdings Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries
  • 1)LTIFR
    • LTIFR = (the number of lost time injuries ÷ total working hours) × 1,000,000
    • Until 2021, total working hours were calculated based on the number of Group company employees (regular employees and temporary/non-regular employees) as of the end of September, assuming the annual working hours per person is 2,000 hours. Beginning in 2022, actual total working hours until the end of December as reported by the companies have been used. Calculated using the method used up to 2021, LTIFR for FY2022 would be 1.25, 0.98, and 1.46 for whole Group, Japan, and overseas, respectively.
  • 2)Severity rate
    • Severity rate = (Number of workday lost ÷ total work hours) x 1,000
    • Number of workday lost: Fatalities and severe incidents =7,500 days, temporary work lost = lost calendar days x 300/365
  • 3)Manufacturing, Pulp, paper and paper product manufacturing:
    • The data is quoted from an occupational accident survey (investigator: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, target worksites: 100 or more employees).

9. Lost time incidents and fatalities

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
Number of work related lost time incidents1) Oji Group Whole Group 68 61 74 88 104
Japan (Permanent employees) 21 25 25 20 25
Japan (Non permanent employees) 4 2 6 8 4
Overseas (Permanent employees) 43 34 43 60 73
Overseas (Non permanent employees) 0 0 0 0 2
Contractors2) Whole Group 10 9 10 5 12
Japan 10 9 10 5 12
Overseas - - - - -
Number of work related fatalities Oji Group Whole Group 1 1 0 3 2
Japan (Permanent employees) 1 1 0 2 0
Japan (Non permanent employees) 0 0 0 0 0
Overseas (Permanent employees) 0 0 0 1 2
Overseas (Non permanent employees) 0 0 0 0 0
Contractors2) Whole Group 0 0 0 0 2
Japan 0 0 0 0 1
Overseas 0 0 0 0 1
Occasional entering contractors3) Whole Group 1 2 0 0 1
Japan 0 1 0 0 0
Overseas 1 1 0 0 1
  • Aggregation period: January 1 to December 31
  • Boundary of data aggregation: consolidated companies,contractors,occasional entering contractors
  • 1)Work related lost time incident :If 2 persons injured at one time,it counts 2.
  • 2)Contractors: affiliates being resident on the Group’s premises(non-consolidate companies in Oji Group and non-Oji Group companies)
  • 3)Occasional entering contractors: Business operators who enter the Group’s premises on a temporary basis.

10. Oji Group safety and health education records (in Japan)

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Safety and Health Education programs FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
1. General Safety and Health Managers Seminar, Overall safety and health controller, Safety and Health Seminar for Top management 10 8 25 6 11
2. Education at the Time of appointment of a Safety Officer (including complementary education) 155 98 82 123 125
3. Health Officer education (including complementary education) 20 13 12 16 18
4. Safety and Health Promoter education (for worksites less than 50 workers) 24 14 7 19 27
5. Foremen, etc. education/Safety and Health Controller education (including Capacity development) , RodoshoSafety and Health Education Trainer 371 206 314 404 542
6. Education at the time of employment (for new employees) 1,031 655 828 934 1,220
7. Education for relocated and transferred employees 271 422 456 372 326
8. Skill training course (Operations Chief or training for restricted employment) 1,137 776 1,162 996 1,069
9. Special education (Education for safety and health to those who are currently engaged in dangerous or harmful work) 2,289 1,063 1,674 961 914
10. Risk assessment training 264 217 427 260 185
11. OSHMS (Occupational Safety and Health Management System) related education/training 33 27 45 37 37
12. Machine safety education 84 39 1 23 26
13. Chemical Management education 307 229 117 141 360
14. Work-related          
  Safety and Health education for workers in charge of dangerous or harmful work (except for Special Education) 225 213 369 169 127
Safety education on heavy machines including forklifts 4,222 2,327 2,796 4,112 5,120
Danger and safety sensory education (Including education with virtual reality devices) 2,013 14,172 12,776 10,637 9,848
Health and safety education on dangerous chemicals/powder substances (powder dust) 280 590 666 208 331
Safety education on electricity/education for workers responsible for power control 1,033 1,050 941 1,075 1,120
Health and safety education on ionizing radiation 353 320 401 306 332
Others 469 395 40 19 125
15. For each rank          
  Health and safety education 1- 5 years after joining the company 842 894 1,482 947 941
Health and safety education for junior workers 262 334 203 84 152
Health and safety education for middle/senior-level workers 1,774 1,182 1,497 1,409 1,596
Health and safety education for general workers 588 915 1,114 839 1,137
Health and safety education for managers and supervisors 1,056 808 1,086 994 1,534
Education for employees in charge of safety education (including instructors) 229 197 183 232 172
Others 294 67 906 193 843
16. Training and lecture          
  KYT training/ KYT leader training (KYT: Kiken Yochi Training (Hazard Prediction training)) 263 234 94 23 1,930
First aid training (including AED (Automated External Defibrillator)) 909 292 223 325 1,137
Prevention of heatstroke 9,900 6,291 4,444 4,327 4,909
Mental health and Health promotion 947 559 536 461 532
Traffic safety 6,276 3,225 4,098 4,938 5,928
Others 7,100 4,714 3,329 3,567 5,677
17. Other (education on a variety of qualifications and work) 709 774 277 940 850
18. Other (fire and earthquake drill) 9,598 11,028 10,887 12,389 12,179
Total 55,338 54,348 53,498 52,486 61,380
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Consolidated companies in Japan

11. Social contribution

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
Total Amount of corporate donations (million yen) 225 119 279 415 184
  • Boundary of data aggregation: Consolidated companies

12. Social contribution activities

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Group company Country/ Area Program
CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Partnerships with Beekeepers
CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Farming partnerships
CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Effective council -Childhood and Adolescence, The elderly
CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil Entrepreneur Training Program
CENIBRA Minas Gerais, Brazil UNIECO - Company-Community Integration Units
Pan Pac Hawke's Bay, New Zealand Supporting Social contribution projects through Pan Pac Environmental Trust
Pan Pac Hawke's Bay, New Zealand Sponsorship of Hawke’s Bay Rescue Helicopter Trust
QPFL Binh Dinh, Vietnam Dispatching a team of doctors to remote villages etc.

Governance

For latest information of corporate officers, click this page.

1. Structure of the Board of Directors

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Breakdown As of June 2024
Number of Directors 12
Number of Outside Directors 4
Number of Independent Outside Directors 4
Number of Female Director 2

2. Status of attendance at the Board of Director's Meeting

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Board of Director's Meeting in FY2023
Director, Chairman of the Board Masatoshi Kaku 16 / 16 (100%)
Director of the Board,
President and CEO		 Hiroyuki Isono 16 / 16 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Vice President		 Fumio Shindo 16 / 16 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Senior Executive Officer		 Kazuhiko Kamada 16 / 16 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Shigeki Aoki 16 / 16 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Akio Hasebe 16 / 16 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Takayuki Moridaira 16 / 16 (100%)
Director of the Board,
Executive Officer		 Yuji Onuki 16 / 16 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Michihiro Nara 14 / 16 (87.5%)
Independent Outside Director Sachiko Ai 13 / 16 (81.3%)
Independent Outside Director Seiko Nagai 16 / 16 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Hiromichi Ogawa 16 / 16 (100%)

3. Structure and attendance of Nomination Committee

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Nomination Committee Meeting in FY 2023
Director, Chairman of the Board Masatoshi Kaku 2 / 2 (100%)
Director of the Board,
President and CEO		 Hiroyuki Isono 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Michihiro Nara 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Sachiko Ai 0 / 2 (0%)
Independent Outside Director Seiko Nagai 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Hiromichi Ogawa
(Appointed June 2022)		 2 / 2 (100%)

4. Structure and attendance of Compensation Committee

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Compensation Committee Meeting in FY 2023
Director, Chairman of the Board Masatoshi Kaku 2 / 2 (100%)
Director of the Board,
President and CEO		 Hiroyuki Isono 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Michihiro Nara 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Sachiko Ai 1 / 2 (50%)
Independent Outside Director Seiko Nagai 2 / 2 (100%)
Independent Outside Director Hiromichi Ogawa
(Appointed June 2022)		 2 / 2 (100%)

5. Structure of Audit & Supervisory Board

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Breakdown As of June 2024
Number of Audit & Supervisory Board members 5
Number of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board members 3
Number of Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board members 3

6. Status of attendance at the Audit & Supervisory Board Meeting

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Positions Name Status of attendance at the Audit & Supervisory Board Meeting in FY 2023
Audit & Supervisory Board member Tomihiro Yamashita 13 / 13 (100%)
Audit & Supervisory Board member Nobuko Otsuka 4 / 4 (100%)
Audit & Supervisory Board member Teruo Yamazaki 9 / 9 (100%)
Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board member Hiderou Chimori 13 / 13 (100%)
Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board member Noriko Sekiguchi 13 / 13 (100%)
Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board member Takashi Nonoue
(Appointed June 2022)		 13 / 13 (100%)

7. Total amount of remuneration, etc. for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(FY2023)

Position No. of Personnel Total remuneration (million yen) Fixed remuneration (million yen) Performance-linked remuneration (million yen)
Bonuses Stock-based remuneration
Director 12 528 275 137 115
(Independent Outside Director) (4) (60) (60) (0) (0)
Audit & Supervisory Board Member 6 94 94 0 0
(Independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member) (3) (39) (39) (0) (0)
Total 18 622 369 137 115
  • *Note:Numbers less than one million yen are rounded down to the nearest million.

8. Remuneration of the Company's Accounting Auditors

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.

(Unit: million yen)

Segment FY2023
Remuneration of the Company's Accounting Auditors 210
The amount required to be paid to Accounting Auditors by the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries
Total amount of other property benefits		 447

9. Political contribution amount

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2023
Political contribution amount (1,000 yen) 1,268

10. Shares of the Company

11. Major shareholders top10

12. Anti-corruption

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
Segment FY2023
Number of staff dismissed due to non-compliance with anti-corruption policies 0
Cost of fines, penalties or settlements in relation to corruption (yen) 0
Provisions for fines and settlements in relation to corruption (yen) 0

13. Number of whistleblowing cases received

You can see this table by scrolling horizontally.
  FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
Number of whistleblowing cases 114 140 138 133 129